期刊文献+

黑格尔、马克思和怀特海——从“过程”所体现的西方哲学思维方式的转变看科学与人文之间的冲突 被引量:2

Hegel,Marx and Whitehead——Viewing the conflicts between sciences and humanities from the basic transformation of mode of thinking in western philosophy embodied by "process"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 强调关注和研究“过程”意味着西方思想的基本思维方式和认识模式的根本转变。对黑格尔、马克思和怀特海的过程思想特征的概括和比较表明,这种思维方式和认识模式所具有的根本缺陷及其巨大惯性,是当代西方的科学与人文之间的冲突的最主要根源之一。只有运用扬弃了“过程”思想的“社会个体生成论”,才可能克服这种根本缺陷及其惯性,并找到彻底解决这种冲突的现实有效的途径。 This essay emphasizes that concerning with and researching on Process means a basic transformation of the mode of thinking and pattern of knowing of Western Thought. By summarizing and comparing the characteristics of Process Thought in Hegel, Marx and Whitehead respectively, it points out that one of the most principal reasons of the conflicts between sciences and humanities in the Western, is the basic shortcomings and their great inertia of Western mode of thinking and pattern of knowing. The author believes that only by the Social Individual Growing-up Theory which is established by himself and sublating these kinds of Process Thought, can we overcome these shortcomings and remove their great inertia, and thereby find the really effective way for resolving these conflicts radically.
作者 霍桂桓
出处 《江苏行政学院学报》 2006年第5期18-23,共6页 The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
关键词 科学与人文之间的冲突 过程思想及其特征 西方思想的基本思维方式和认识模式 社会个体生成论 Conflicts Between Natural Sciences and Humanities in the Western Characteristics of Process Thought Westem Mode of Thinking and Pattern of Knowing Basic Transformation The Social Individual Growing-up Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1(德)黑格尔(GeorgWilhelmFriedrichHegel)著,贺麟.小逻辑[M]三联书店,1954.

同被引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部