高职教学质量考核体系建设改革探讨被引量：3

Construction of systemic examination of student quality in higher vocational education

下载PDF

导出

摘要改革高职教育的考核方式应从我国高职教育的特色和人才培养目标出发,结合不同专业、不同课程的特殊要求,突破现有的理论考核为主体,以笔试答卷为主要考核模式,构建一种高职学生开放式、多元化的能力培养考核体系,强化考试考核管理,推进实施毕业证书与职业资格证书的双证就业制度。 The aim of higher vocation education should be emphasized the ability tram arid occupation qualification. However, there are obvious problem in examination of student＇ s quality at present. It is necessary to construct a systemic examinatiou. The various forms, open and ability exam should be advocated. Meantime, the profession qualification authentication also needs to be integrated with their exam system on campus in order to obtain employment.

作者冯俊华王恩宁

机构地区陕西科技大学管理学院

出处《边疆经济与文化》 2006年第9期155-156,共2页 The Border Economy and Culture

关键词高职教育教学质量考核体系 Higher vocational education teching quality examination system

分类号 G420 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1张伟远,陈丽.评价模式在远程教育中的运用之探讨[J].远程教育杂志,2004,22(4):55-59. 被引量：5
2刘普照,郎静.浅议高职教育的专业设置[J].中国成人教育,2004(5):33-33. 被引量：11
3韩传信.建立发展性的学校评价模式[J].安徽教育学院学报,2002,20(4):91-93. 被引量：6

二级参考文献19

1瞿葆奎.教育评价[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1989..
2[1]Chen, H. T. & Rossi, P. H. ( 1992 ). Using Theory to Improve Program and Policy Evaluation. Westport, C T: Greenwood.Couneil of Teacher Education, Plymouth State University. (2002).
3[2]School Administrators Questionnaire. 〈http ://www.plymouth.edu/ir/surveys/examples/sehool_admin_ex.php3〉 ( Accessed Mar 2,2003 )
4[3]Mertens. D M. ( 1998 ). Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
5[4]Fetterman, D. M. ( 1994 ). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15 ( 1 ), 1-15.
6[5]Higher Education External Relations Association of Hong Kong. ( 2003 ). Joint University Graduate Survey 2003. Hong Kong:Higher Education External Relations Association of Hong Kong.
7[6]Information Management Research Institute, Northumbria University. ( 2003 ). UK survey of library and learning resource provision in further education colleges. 〈http://www.cilip.org.uk/practice/research.html〉 ( Accessed Feb 21, 2003 )
8[7]Mertens, D. M. ( 1994 ). Training evaluators: Unique skills and knowledge. In J. Altschuld & M Engle ( Eds. ). The preparation of professional evaluators : issues, perspectives, and current status.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 17-28.
9[8]NAIT Institutional Research, The Northern Alberta Institution of Technology ( 2003 ). NAIT Employer Satisfaction Survey 2003,〈http://www.nait.ab.ca/ir/studiesandsurveys.htm〉 ( Accessed Feb 21,2003 )
10[9]Ontario College of Applied Arts and Technology ( 1998 ). The Graduate Outcomes/Graduate Satisfaction Survey 〈www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/serials/eprofile97-98/ax2.pdf〉 ( Accessed Mar 1,2003 )