摘要
对法律进行道德论证会遇到“明希豪森困境”和“休谟问题”的干扰,语言学规则为法律论证提供了一种新的可能,虽然语言学论证中也会有诸如概念含义过于复杂等困难,但是,作为一种不同于传统法律论证理论,其所提供的解释视角和评判标准则是很有价值的。
The moral argument of law will be interrupted by Münchhausen- Trilemma and Hume's problem. Although the linguistic argumentation has many difficulties such as complex concept meaning, the linguistic rules provide a new possibility for legal argumentation. However, as an argumentation theory, which is different from the traditional legal argumentation theory, the explanation viewpoints and judging standard it provided are valuable.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期17-24,共8页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
法律论证
道德
语言哲学
legal argumentation
moral
linguistic philosophy