期刊文献+

经济学中的效率评价标准评析

A review of the efficiency criteria in economics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新古典经济学将理想的帕累托最优作为衡量效率的标准,犯了将理想与现实进行比较的错误;新制度经济学采用比较制度方法,结果取消了效率评价的标准。以独立于经济过程的价值标准评价效率是前两者的共同特征。而以哈耶克为代表的奥地利经济学则将目光转向了经济制度结构,把最大限度地实现每一经济主体的目标作为经济效率的评价标准。 In the new classical economics, Pareto optimum is treated as the ideal criteria for assessing the efficiency of resource distribution, which mistakenly compares the ideal with the reality. In the new institutional economics the comparative system method is adopted, but in it the efficiency criteria are abandoned. Austrian eeonomics orients efficiency assessment to eeonomic institution, which requires all the members to achieve their individual ultimate goals.
作者 邹方斌
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第6期51-53,共3页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 帕累托效率 比较制度方法 交换效率 Pareto optimum comparative system method catallaxy efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]欧肯.国民经济学基础[M].左大培,译.北京:商务印书馆,1995.
  • 2[2]COASE RONALD H.The Problem of Social Cost[J].Journal of Law and Economics,1960(Ⅲ):1 -44.
  • 3[3]CHEUNG S.Economic Explanation:Selected Papers of Steven N S Cheung[M].Hong Kong:Arcadia Press Limited,2005.
  • 4[4]HAYEK F.Competition as a Discovery Procedure[M]//The Essence of Hayek.California:Hoover Institute Press.1984.254-265.
  • 5[5]CORDATO R.Efficiency[M]//Peter Boettke.The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics.aldershot:edwardelgar publishing limited,1994,131-135.
  • 6[6]HAYEK F.The Use of Knowledge in Society[J].American Economic Review,1945 (September):519-530.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部