期刊文献+

MK1精密附着体义齿与卡环式活动义齿的咀嚼效能比较 被引量:4

Comparison between the masticatory efficiency of MK1 attachment and that of clasp-type removable denture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价MK1附着体在肯氏Ⅱ类牙列缺损修复中的临床效果,及与相应的卡环式活动义齿的咀嚼效能比较。方法采用MK1附着体30副,修复30例上颌单侧末端游离牙列缺损,此前患者均经卡环式活动义齿修复,比较两者的临床效果和咀嚼效能。结果经过相同时间的临床观察和实验,MK-1附着体的咀嚼效能高于卡环式活动义齿(P<0.001);90%以上的患者认为附着体义齿美观、舒适、稳固、咀嚼有力。结论MK1附着体义齿的咀嚼效能、美观舒适性较卡环式活动义齿好。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of MK1 attachment, and compare the masticatory efficiency of removable denture. Methods 30 MK1 attachments and 30 removable dentures were applied to restore 30 maxillary extension partial dentition defect cases.Clinical effects were evaluated between the attachments and removable dentures. Results 30 patients with MK1 attachment prostheses were followed up for a year. The masticatory efficiency of attachment was higher than removable denture (P〈0.001). More than 90% patients with attachments felt comfortable and it was aesthetic. Conclusion MK1 attachment achieved better masticatory efficiency than removable denture.
作者 唐颖 刘莉
出处 《口腔材料器械杂志》 2006年第2期75-76,81,共3页 Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices
关键词 附着体 末端游离缺失 活动义齿 固定-活动联合修复 Attachment Extension partial dentition defect Removable partial denture Fixed-removable prostheses
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1徐君伍.口腔修复学(第四版)[M].北京:人民工业出版社,2000.54-55.
  • 2郑元俐,董弘斌,钱琼.三种精密附着体的临床应用评价[J].上海口腔医学,2001,10(4):313-315. 被引量:14
  • 3BERG T, Caputo AA.Comparision of load transfer by maxillary distal extension removable partial dentures with a spring-loads plunger attachment and l-bar retainer. J Prosthet Dent,1992,68:492-499.
  • 4EI Charkawi HG, EI Waked MT. Effect of splinting on load distribution of extracoronal attachment with distal extension prosthesis in vitro. J Prosthet Dent, 1996,76:315-320.

二级参考文献2

  • 1徐君伍.口腔修复学(第4版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.209.
  • 2宁丽 叶秀芬 等.正常he者咀嚼效能吸光度值的测定[J].上海口腔医学,1988,8(4):190-193.

共引文献17

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部