摘要
目的:比较自酸蚀粘结剂和全酸蚀粘结剂在楔状缺损粘结修复中的效果。方法:25例楔状缺损病例,38对患牙,采用自身对照方法左侧使用自酸蚀粘结剂XenoⅢ,右侧使用单瓶粘结剂Prime&Bond NT,均应用复合体Dyract修复。1年后随访,根据改良的USPHS/Ryge临床评价标准对修复体进行盲法评价。结果:1年后随访率达95%。XenoⅢ组36个修复体中有33个修复体保存,保存率92%。Prime&BondNT组中有32个修复体保存,保存率89%。两组修复体的保存率和脱落率经统计学处理没有显著性差异。结论:自酸蚀粘结剂在楔状缺损粘结修复中具有较好的临床效果。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of a self-etching bonding system and a total etching system restored in pairs in the same patient after 1 year according to the modified USPHS criteria . Method: Thirty pairs of restorations were placed in 25 patients. Xeno Ⅲ was used in the left side, Prime&Bond NT was in the right side. The cavity was restored with compomer Dyract. Direct clinical evaluations of the restorations were performed at baseline and after one year. Result: There was no significant difference between the two systems with respect to any of the criteria evaluated. The retention rate of Xeno Ⅲ was 92 %, Prime & Bond NT was 89 %. Conclusion: The one-year clinical performance of the two bonding system was satisfactory and had no significantly difference for any of the parameters evaluated in this prospective longitudinal study.
出处
《临床口腔医学杂志》
2006年第9期556-557,共2页
Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词
牙本质粘结剂
自酸蚀
全酸蚀
楔状缺损
dentin bonding agent
self-etching
total etching
edge-shape defeat