期刊文献+

辽朝兴衰的历史启示 被引量:2

The Revelation of Liao Dynasty' s Flourish and Downfall——"Decay Will Lead to Defeat "
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人们常说“落后就要挨打”,其实,这一历史启示并不具有普遍意义,中国历史上的辽金元政权就曾创造过“落后打败先进”的光辉业绩,但到了他们变后进为先进的后期以后,又被新兴的尚处于落后阶段的女真、蒙古和起义军所打败。契丹初兴之时,能够以一个“落后”政权打败“先进”政权,不仅仅是因为他们拥有强大的骑兵,而是因为那时的契丹人具有一种“惟知有国,而不知有身”的上下一心求发展,艰苦奋斗创大业的民族精神。到了契丹变后进为先进的后期以后,变得不堪一击,又被新兴的尚处于落后阶段的金政权所打败,也不是因为契丹人没有骑兵,而是因为契丹人丧失了原来那种团结奋斗的民族精神,是辽朝逐渐走向腐朽的必然结果。从辽朝的兴衰中,我们可以看出,并非是“落后就要挨打”,而是“腐败就要挨打”,我们应该牢记这一沉痛的历史教训。 People all said that "decay will lead to defeat", but it doesn't have a general meaning. The Liao,Jin and Yuan regimes all set the brilliant record of " the lagged beat the advanced", but after they became the advanced, they were defeated by the lagged Jurchen, Mongol and other rebellers. At the primary period, the lagged Qidan people could defeat the advanced, not because they had powerful trooper, but because they had a great national spirits of "only know country but no body" to pursue development and showing the utmost fortitude to achieve great undertaking. After Qidan became the advanced, they were easily defeated by the lagged Jin regime, which was not because Qidan didn't have powerful trooper, but because they lost the previous united national spirits and was the inevitable result of the downfall of Liao dynasty. From the flourish and downfall, we can see that it is "decay will lead to defeat", not "lagged will lead to defeat" and we should bear in mind firmly this disastrous historical lesson.
作者 赵永春
出处 《黑龙江民族丛刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期65-72,共8页 Heilongjiang National Series
关键词 辽朝 兴衰 历史启示 Liao dynasty flourish and downfall historical enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1孙何.论御戎[A].杨士奇.历代名臣奏议(卷322).御边[C].四库全书本.
  • 2杨士奇.历代名臣奏议(卷33)·治道[C].四库全书本.
  • 3吕颐浩.忠穆集(卷2).奏议·上边事善后十策[M].四库全书本.
  • 4徐梦莘.三朝北盟会编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987..
  • 5辽史(卷37).地理志[M].中华书局,1974.437.
  • 6]辽史(卷90).耶律敌禄等传·传论[M].北京:中华书局,1974.1359.
  • 7辽史(卷2)[M].北京:中华书局,1974.24.24.
  • 8叶隆礼.契丹国志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985..
  • 9辽史(卷55).仪卫志一[M].北京:中华书局,1974.899.
  • 10辽史(卷95).耶律大悲奴等传·传论[M].北京:中华书局,1974.1393.

共引文献167

同被引文献11

  • 1赵永春,周力.金朝兴衰的历史启示[J].江海学刊,2007(2):165-170. 被引量:1
  • 2[8]叶子奇.草木子[M].北京:中华书局,1959
  • 3[3]脱脱等.元史.[M].北京:中华书局,1976.
  • 4[5]赵珙.蒙鞑备录[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
  • 5[6]谢再善译.蒙古秘史[M].北京:中华书局,1956.
  • 6[8]彭大雅撰,徐霆疏.黑鞑事略[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
  • 7[11]吴澄.吴文正集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
  • 8[14]许有壬.至正集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
  • 9陈邦瞻.宋史纪事本末[M].北京:中华书局,1977..
  • 10杨福瑞.试论辽朝对辽东地区的经略[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版),2008,34(2):55-58. 被引量:4

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部