期刊文献+

行政自由裁量权规制模式探析

On the Regulative Mode of Administrative Discretion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代行政法最突出的特征表现为行政自由裁量权的广泛运用。从法治是对人性弱点的合理怀疑角度,行政程序是控制行政自由裁量权滥用最理想的工具;作为行政程序的保障,行政主体因违法行为或违规事实的出现应承受行政责任之归结;从人性合理性角度,潜意识对行政公务人员行政心理起有重大作用并提出法律信仰机制的建立和完善是滥用行政自由裁量权的休止符。 In the modern administrative law, the most outstanding characteristics is shown as the extensive application of the administrative discretion. Seen from the aspect that rule by law is the reasonable suspicion of weakness of human nature, administrative procedure is the ideal tool, which can control power abusement of administrative discretion. As the guarantee of administrative procedure, the administrative subject should take the administrative responsibility for his illegal activities or other facts stipulated in the rules and regulations. Seen from the aspect of rationality of human nature, subconsciousness plays an important role in the administrative psychology of a public officer. And then the thesis proposes that the foundation perfection of legal faith mechanism can bring the administrative discretion to the end.
作者 田永彩
出处 《莱阳农学院学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期55-57,共3页 Journal of Laiyang Agricultural College(Social Science Edition)
关键词 行政自由裁量权 行政责任 行政程序 法律信仰 administrative discretion administrative procedure administrative responsiblity legal faith
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[德]哈特穆特·毛雷尔 高家伟 译.行政法学总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000..
  • 2[3]胡建淼.行政违法问题探索[M].北京:法律出版社,2000,295.
  • 3[日]室井力 吴微 译.日本现代行政法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1995.34-35.
  • 4[6][美]庞德.通过法律的社会控制[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986,65.
  • 5[7]张国庆.行政管理概述[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000,486.
  • 6[8]柏格森.创造进化论,转引自黄颂杰:二十世纪哲学经典文本--欧洲大陆哲学卷[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999,119.
  • 7[奥]弗洛伊德.精神分析引论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984.216.
  • 8[11][美]伯尔曼.法律与宗教[M].上海:三联出版社,1991.

共引文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部