期刊文献+

周公称王辨 被引量:1

Inquiry of Zhougong's Lording
下载PDF
导出
摘要 周公是否称王,在封建时代曾是一个重大的政治问题。史家多有认为周公曾经称王者,果如此,史书记载的很多地方就不能自圆其说。要辨清这一问题,就需要考证康叔封及其儿子康伯髡是否被混淆了。据考证,传统上被认为是写给康叔的《康诰》,有可能是写给康叔的儿子康伯的,这是周公未及称王的有力证据。 Zhougong's lording or not is an important political issue in feudal society of China. Many historians suggest that Zhougong had been a king. If that was true, then there are many of controversies in the historical records themselves, To solve this issue, it seems to need of solving other important question weather Kangbo Mao who was Kangshu's son had been confused with Kangshu Feng. According to textual research, Kanggao that has been traditionally regarded as a letter written to Kangshu in fact was written to Kangshu's son Kangbo, which is a strong proof proving that Zhougong never lord.
作者 赵儒迎
机构地区 渤海大学历史系
出处 《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期33-37,共5页 Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
关键词 周公 称王 康叔 成王 Zhougong lording Kangshu Feng Fu King Cheng
  • 相关文献

同被引文献81

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部