摘要
大陆与香港具有不同的法律传统。香港回归后,全国人民代表大会先后对《香港基本法》进行了三次解释,从而引发了各方的争议。对人大释法的权限与程序的合法性进行法律分析,人大三次释法符合一国两制下的法律解释体系的要求。
Since HongKong came back to China, National People's Congress(NPC) had explained the Basic Law of HKSAR of PRC three times , and these events have given rise to great disputation. It is necessary to analyze the validity and rationality of the interpretation of the Basic Law by NPC. By analysis, the NPC has the power to interpret the Basic Law.
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2006年第3期22-24,共3页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
法律解释
香港基本法
解释权
争议
人大解释
the legal interpetion
the Basic Law of HKDSAR of PRC
the right of interpetion
controversy