期刊文献+

一种新颖混合贝叶斯分类模型研究 被引量:5

A Novel Hybrid Bayesian Classification Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 朴素贝叶斯分类器(Naive Bayesian classmer,NB)是一种简单而有效的分类模型,但这种分类器缺乏对训练集信息的充分利用,影响了它的分类性能。通过分析NB的分类原理,并结合线性判别分析(Linear Discriminant A- nalysis,LDA)与核判别分析(Kemel Discriminant Analysis,KDA)的优点,提出了一种混合贝叶斯分类模型DANB (Discriminant Analysis Naive Bayesian classifier,DANB)。将该分类方法与NB和TAN(Tree Augmented Naive Bayesian classifier,TAN)进行实验比较,结果表明,在大多数数据集上,DANB分类器具有较高的分类正确率。 Naive Bayesian classifier (NB) is a simple and effective classification model, but it is unable to make the best of the information of the training dataset, thus affecting its classification performance. On the basis of analyzing the classification principle of NB and integrating strongpoint of Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Kernel Discriminant Analysis (KDA), a new hybrid Bayesian classification model, DANB (Discriminant Analysis Naive Bayesian classifter), is proposed. DANB classifier is compared with NB and TAN (Tree Augmented Naive Bayesian classifier) by an experiment. Experiment results show that this model has higher classification accuracy in most datasets.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第9期135-139,共5页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助课题(70371026)。
关键词 朴素贝叶斯分类器 线性判别分析 核判别分析 TAN分类器 Naive Bayesian classifier,Linear discriminant analysis,Kernel discriminant analysis,TAN classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Fried N,Geiger D,Goldszmidt M.Bayesian network classifiers.Machine Learning,1997,29(2-3):131~163
  • 2Langley P,Iba W,Thompson K.An analysis of Bayesian classifiers.In:Proc.of the 10th National Conf on Artificial Intelligence.Menlo Park:AAAI Press,1992.223~228
  • 3Kononenko I.Semi Bayesian classifier.In:Proc.of the 6th European Working Session on Learning.New York:Springer-Verlag,1991.206~219
  • 4Pazzani M J.Searching for dependencies in Bayesian classifiers.In:Learning from Data:Artificial Intelligence and Statistics V.New York:Springer-Verlag,1996.239~248
  • 5Langley P,Sage S.Induction of selective Bayesian classifiers.In:Proc.of the 10th Conf.on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,1994.399~406
  • 6Webb G I,Pazzani M J.Adjusted probability naive Bayesian induction.In:Proc.of the 11th Australian Joint Conf.on Artificial Intelligence.Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1998.285~295
  • 7Kohavi R.Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers:A decision-tree hybrid.In:Proc.of the 2nd Int'l Conf.on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Menlo Park:AAAI Press,1996.202~207
  • 8Keogh E J,Pazzani M J.A comparison of Distribution-based and Classification-based Approaches.In:Proc.of the Uncertainty'99:The 7th Int'l Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,1999.225~230
  • 9Cheng J,Greiner R.Comparing Bayesian network classifiers.In:Proc of the 15th Conf on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,1999.101~108
  • 10Chickering D M,Geiger D,Heckerman D.Learning Bayesian networks is NP-complete.In:Learning from Data:Artificial Intelligence and Statistics V.New York:Springer-Verlag,1996.121~130

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部