摘要
社会工作专业从产生之初就产生了两极化的趋势,即萌生于慈善组织会社的注重提供个人服务的取向和产生于睦邻组织的注重环境的改造及建立共同利益的取向。Spetch和Courtney在《背叛的天使》一书中批判了社会工作者心理治疗化的现象,认为社会工作者是背叛的天使,远离了自己的服务对象,背叛了社会工作的使命。本文通过回顾社会工作两极化产生的历史,分析社会工作心理治疗化的原因及限制,同时通过回顾中国大陆社会工作产生的背景,反思社会工作专业化的定位。
As the emergence of social work, there had existed the tendency of polarization. Namely, one was from COS（ Charity Organization Society） which focused on providing individual service; while the other came from Settlement House that emphasized construction of environment and common good. Spetch＆Courtney had pointed out in the book 〈 Unfaithful Angels 〉 that social workers were very enthusiastic about psychological therapy. As a result, they were unfaithful to social work＇s mission. The article tries to analyze the psychologicalization of social work and its disadvantages by reviewing the history of polarization of social work. What＇s more, reflects the professional orientation of Chinese social work through turning back to the emergence background of social work in China.
关键词
社会工作
两极化
专业定位
Social work
polarization
professional orientation
