期刊文献+

大袋鼠格斗行为的种内种间差异分析 被引量:2

Intraspecific-Interspecific Analysis of Agonistic Behavior in Two Macropus(M.rufus & M.giganteus)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨了在接近自然状况下赤大袋鼠和灰大袋鼠格斗行为是否存在种内和种间差异及其影响因素.结果表明两种大袋鼠格斗行为并不一致,种群内中年龄结构是导致不同格斗行为发生的主要因素.这一研究结果对大袋鼠的人工繁育和种群保护有一定的指导意义. In this research the agonistic behavior of two Macropus: M. rufus and M. giganteus is studied and analyzed in order to discuss whether this behavior is intraspecifically and interspecifically different. The result shows that this behavior varies between species and within species. Moreover, the age structure is the main factor leading to the different agonistic behaviors. These results would be of help for the artificial breeding and population conservation for the Macropus.
出处 《南京师大学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期95-98,共4页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词 赤大袋鼠 灰大袋鼠 格斗行为 种间种内比较 Maeropus rufus, Macropus giganteus, agonistic behavior, Intraspecific-Interspecific comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Newsome. Ecology of red kangaroos[J]. Australian Zoologist, 1971,16( 1 ) :32 50.
  • 2Kirsch, Poole. Taxonomy and distribution of the grey kangaroos, Macropus giganteus[J].Australian Journal of Zoology,1972(3) :315-39.
  • 3Russell. Agonistic interactions in the red kangaroo (Megaleia rufa) [J]. J of Mammalogy, 1970, 8:51-80.
  • 4濮燕群.猴类逃笼行为与诱捕技术研究[J].南京师大学报:自然科学版,1995,18:111-111.
  • 5徐麟木.南京养殖东北虎40年成就[J].南京师大学报:自然科学版,1995,18:106-106.
  • 6Ron Hacker, Steve McLeod, John Druhan. Brigitte Tenhumberg and Udai Pradhan. Kangaroo Management Options[M].Australia: Murray-Darling Basin Commission, 2004.
  • 7Huntingford, Turner. Animal Conflict[M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1987.
  • 8尚玉昌.行为生态学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.

共引文献1

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部