期刊文献+

劳拉西泮鼻内给药和副醛肌注治疗儿童长时间抽搐的疗效和安全性比较:一项开放的随机试验 被引量:1

Efficacy and safety of intranasal lorazepam versus intramuscular paraldehyde for protracted convulsions in children: an open randomised trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, rectal diazepam or intramuscular paraldehyde are commonly used as firstline anticonvulsant agents in the emergency treatment of seizures in children. These treatments can be expensive and sometimes toxic. We aimed to assess a drug and delivery system that is potentially more effective, safer, and easier to administer than those presently in use. Methods: We did an open randomised trial in a paediatric emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Malawi. 160 children aged over 2 months with seizures persisting for more than 5 min were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal lorazepam (100 μg/kg, n=80) or intramuscular paraldehyde (0.2 mL/kg, n=80). The primary outcome measure was whether the presenting seizure stopped with one dose of assigned anticonvulsant agent within 10 min of administration. The primary analysis was by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00116064. Findings: Intranasal lorazepam stopped convulsions within 10 min in 60 (75%) episodes treated (absolute risk 0.75, 95%CI 0.64-0.84), and intramuscular paraldehyde in 49 (61.3%; absolute risk 0.61, 95%CI 0.49-0.72). No clinically important cardiorespiratory events were seen in either group (95%binomial exact CI 0-4.5%), and all children finished the trial. Interpretation: Intranasal lorazepam is effective, safe, and provides a less invasive alternative to intramuscular paraldehyde in children with protracted convulsions. The ease of use of this drug makes it an attractive and preferable prehospital treatment option. Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, rectal, diazepam or intramuscular paraldehyde are commonly used as firstline anticonvulsant agents in the emergency treatment of seizures in children. These treatments can be expensive and sometimes toxic. We aimed to assess a drug and delivery system that is potentially more effective, safer, and easier to administer than those presently in use. Methods: We did an open randomised trial in a paediatric emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Malawi. 160 children aged over 2 months with seizures persisting for more than 5 min were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal lorazepam (100μg/kg, n=80) or intramuscular paraldehyde (0. 2 mL/kg, n = 80) . The primary outcome measure was whether the presenting seizure stopped with one dose of assigned anticonvulsant agent within 10 min of administration. The primary analysis was by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with Clinical Trials. gov, number NCT00116064. Findings: Intranasal lorazepam stopped convulsions within 10 min in 60 (75%) episodes treated (absolute risk 0.75, 95% CI 0. 64- 0.84), and intramuscular paraldehyde in 49 (61.3%, absolute risk 0.61, 95% CI 0.49 - 0. 72) .
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册)》 2006年第9期5-6,共2页 Digest of the World Core Medical Journals:Clinical Neurology
  • 相关文献

同被引文献6

  • 1张秀华,邱相君,胡国新,陈醒言.反相高效液相色谱法检测人血浆中的劳拉西泮[J].现代应用药学,2004,21(3):222-224. 被引量:5
  • 2Ahmad S,Ellis JC,Kamwendo H,et al.Efficacy and safetyof intranasal lorazepam versus intramuscular paraldehyde forprotracted convulsions in children:an open randomised trial[J].Lancet,2006,367(9522):1591-1597.
  • 3Kaur P,Kim K.Pharmacokinetics and brain uptake ofdiazepam after intravenous and intranasal administration inrats and rabbits[J].Int J Pharm 2008,364(1):27-35.
  • 4Li L,Nandi I,Kim KH.Development of an ethyl laurate-based microemulsion for rapid-onset intranasal delivery ofdiazepam[J].Int J Pharm,2002,237(1-2):77-85.
  • 5Vyas TK,Babbar AK,Sharma RK,et al.Intranasalmucoadhesive microemulsions of zolmitriptan:preliminarystudies on brain-targeting[J].J Drug Target,2005,13(5):317-324.
  • 6李瑛.劳拉西泮的现状及前景展望[J].中国医药导刊,2000,2(6):30-31. 被引量:14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部