摘要
郭锡良先生主编的《古代汉语》教材新版本中关于连词“则”的用法的解说有不当之处:第一,举例有问题;第二,第二种关系与第三种关系分开固然有道理,但教材表示“情理上的联系”的提法作为划分的标准不科学;第三,“则”从训诂上没有“原来已经”的意思。还存在“先秦以前的上古汉语”提法不妥当,教材部分注解存在施训不当的问题。
There are some in appropriate place about explanation of the conj Ze(则) in the new edition of Ancient Chinese by Guo Xiliang: Firstly, illustration is unsuitable; Secondly, the second relation is separated from the third relation surely reasonable, but the parlance of "the contact on the reason" as standard of com- partmentalization isn't scientific; Thirdly, Ze does not exist the meaning of "originally already". The parlance of "ancient Chinese before the Qin Dynasty" is inappropriate,at the same time, imappropriateness partly exists in the annotation of the teaching material.
出处
《安徽广播电视大学学报》
2006年第3期74-77,共4页
Journal of Anhui Radio & TV University
关键词
郭锡良
《古代汉语》
语法
训诂
Guo Xiliang
Ancient Chinese
grammar
commentary work on classics