试析中介论与一分为三论的区别及在辩证法中的地位

Preliminary Analysis on the Difference between Mediation of One Dividing Into Three and Their Status in Dialectics

传统的机械的一分为二论不顾中介,只谈两点,是违反逻辑和客观实际情况的,带来了理论和实践的困境。中介论和一分为三论都试图纠正辩证法在这个问题上的误区。一分为三论把自己与矛盾论并列起来,试图对一分为二论取而代之,是难以成立的。中介论中也存在着一种试图把中介范畴与矛盾范畴相并列的错误倾向。正确的中介论应该把中介看作是被两极所规定的,中介应当在两极运动过程中、矛盾规律的范围里得到解释和说明,不应该否认矛盾的前提,而应该把自己的存在地位看得比矛盾低一个层次。这种认识恰当地论证了中介论在辩证法体系中的角色和地位。

The mechanical theory of one dividing into two only talks about two, overlooking the mediation. That doesn＇t accord with the logic and external circs, bringing the difficulties in theory and practice. Both the theory of mediation and one dividing into three try to correct this mistake. The theory of one dividing into three opposes itself to the law of contradiction, even trying to replace it. It is a mistake. There is also the same tendency in the theory of mediation. But the genuine mediation theory regards mediation as a category prescribed by the two poles. The mediation should be talked about in the field of the law of contradiction and put itself just below the status of the contradiction. This is the right viewpoint on the status of mediation in dialectic.