期刊文献+

经皮椎体成形术与椎弓根螺钉固定治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折的生物力学研究 被引量:12

Biomechanical comparison of vertebroplasty and pedicle screw fixation system in treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较经皮椎体成形术(PVP)和椎弓根螺钉内固定(PSF)治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折的生物力学强度,为临床应用和离床活动指导提供实验依据。方法18具冻存的新鲜尸体,应用双能X线骨密度仪(DEXA)测定脊柱的骨密度(BND),取胸腰段脊椎(T_(12)~L_2 12具,L_1 6具)随机分成三组:PVP组、PSF组(T_(12)L_2)和正常对照组(L_1),每组6具。PVP组和PFS组实验椎体均制成骨折模型,PVP组给予经双侧椎弓根注入低粘度的含显影剂骨水泥各2.5mL。PSF组于T_(12)、L_2椎弓根置入钉棒系统固定,测试并比较两组和对照组静态最大抗压强度及刚度。结果PVP组骨水泥分布面积皆大于50%,其平均最大抗压强度与刚度分别为(2645±478)N,(117±81)N/mm;PSF组平均最大抗压强度与刚度分别为(1862±620)N,(125±33)N/mm。两组比较平均最大抗压强度差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),最大刚度差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论骨折椎体内注入骨水泥PMMA,其抗压强度优于椎弓根钉方法,对于轻度骨质疏松者尤为适用。PVP术后患者可早期(3~5d)下床活动,而PSF术后患者离床活动时间可适当延后。 Objective To evaluate the biomechanical properties of vertebroplasty and pedicle screw fixation system in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Fresh thoraeolumbar spinal function units (T12-L2) were harvested from 18 old cadaver spines and were divided into three groups randomly: vertebroplasty (PVP)group (n=6), pedicle screw fixation (PSF)group (n=6)and control group (n=6). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured for all the vertebral bodies. The fracture models were created for PVP group and PSF group. Hypoviscosity bone cement with photographic developer of 2.5 mL was injected into both pedieles in the PVP group. The pedicles of T12 and L2 were fixated by screw and rod system in the PSF group. The maximum static compression strength and stiffness of each sample were measured and compared. Results The mean maximum compressive strength and stiffness in PVP group were (2 645 ± 478) N and (117 ± 81 ) N/ mm respectively, while those in PSF group were (1 862 ± 620) N and (125 ± 33) N/mm respectively and those in the control group were 2 500 N and 200 N/mm respectively. The distribution area of bone cement in the vertebra in PVP group was averagely larger than 50%. The difference in the mean maximum compressive strength was statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05) but that in the mean maximum stiffness was insignificant between the two groups. Conclusion Vertebroplasty can be more efficacious than pedicle screw fixation system in treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures because it can provide greater compressive strength.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第9期861-863,共3页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
基金 首都医科大学临床基础联合课题资助(03JL34)
关键词 椎体成形术 生物力学 胸腰椎骨折 椎弓根螺钉 Vertebroplasty Biomechanics Osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture Pedicle screw
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Wilcox RK.The biomechanics of vertebroplasty:a review.Proc Inst Mech Eng,2004,218:1-10.
  • 2Mauck KF,Clarke BL.Diagnosis,screening,prevention,and treatment of osteoporosis.Mayo Clin Proc,2006,81:662-672.
  • 3Tohmeh AG,Mathis JM,Fenton DC,et al.Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures.Spine,1999,24:1772-1776.
  • 4Belkoff SM,Mathis JM,Jasper LE,et al.The biomechanics of vertebroplasty.The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.Spine,2001,26:1537-1541.
  • 5赵必增,李家顺,贾连顺,王以进.椎体成形术的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2003,19(4):244-245. 被引量:13
  • 6Goldhahn J,Reinhold M,Stauber M,et al.Improved anchorage in osteoporotic vertebrae with new implant designs.J Orthop Res,2006,24:917-925.
  • 7Hasegawa T,Inufusa A,Imai Y,et al.Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the ostcoporotic canine lumbar spine model:a pilot study.Spine J,2005,5:239-243.
  • 8Barber JW,Boden SD,Ganey T,et al.Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws:does convergence affect axial pullout strength? J Spinal Disord,1998,11:215-220.
  • 9杨新健,吴中学,林欣,张友平,刘爱华,史万超.经皮椎体成形术治疗高龄重度椎体压缩性骨折[J].中国医学科学院学报,2005,27(1):38-41. 被引量:11

二级参考文献12

  • 1杨新健,吴中学,赵军锋,张友平,宋磊,贺红卫,林欣.经皮椎体成形术治疗椎体血管瘤[J].中国医学科学院学报,2004,26(6):643-646. 被引量:4
  • 2Murphy KJ, Lin D, Gailloud P. Vertebroplasty in benign and maglinant disease. Neurosurg Q, 2001, 11:290-301.
  • 3RonaldMelzack JoelKatz.Text book of Pain[M].北京:科学出版社,Churchill Livingstone:Harcourt Asi,2003.385-427.
  • 4Do HM. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2000, 11(4):235-244.
  • 5Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compressive fractures. Spine, 2001, 26(14):1511-1515.
  • 6Mousavi P, Roth S, Finkelstein J, et al. Volumetric quantification of cement leakage following percutaneous vertebroplasty in metastatic and osteoporotic vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine, 2003, 99(1):56-59.
  • 7Gangi A, Guth S, Imbert JP, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique, and results. Radiographics, 2003,23:e10.
  • 8Hammond A, Riley Ⅲ LH, Gailloud P, et al. Treatment considerations for vertebroplasty in men. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004, 25(10): 1-3.
  • 9Jensen ME, Dion JE. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2000, 10(3):547-568.
  • 10Zoarski GH, Snow P, Olan WJ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes. J Vase Interv Radiol, 2002, 13:139-148.

共引文献22

同被引文献170

引证文献12

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部