摘要
我国《合同法》对表见代理制度的规定过于简略,导致实践中对其认定较为混乱。以其类型和表现形式为研究基础,提出表见代理应当具备主观和客观方面的构成要件以及在认定表见代理时应遵循的原则。
The provision about ostensible agency in contract law is too simple so that the concept in practice is quite inconsistent. To research on it's category and representation, ostensible agency should have constitutive requirements include subjective and objective characters, and we need some principles to define it.
出处
《株洲工学院学报》
2006年第5期52-53,共2页
Journal of Zhuzhou Institute of Technology
关键词
表见代理
构成要件
原则
ostensible agency
unauthorized agency
constitutive requirements