期刊文献+

一清胶囊临床研究文献质量评价 被引量:2

Quality Evaluation of References about Clinical Study of Yiqing Capsules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对一清胶囊临床研究文献进行质量评价。方法:收集国内1990-2005年6月公开发表的一清胶囊相关论文,按照牛津循证医学中心证据标准和临床试验的设计原则,对文献进行质量评价。结果:推荐级别为B级的占68.4%,C级占31.6%;证据水平为2b级占26.3%,3b级占42.1%,4级占31.6%:随机对照试验文献占68.4%,临床对照占5.3%。随机双盲占3.8%;说明组间基线可比性的占11.5%,有诊断标准的占26.9%,有纳入和排除标准占11.5%,说明统计学方法的占19.2%,有客观疗效评价指标占50.0%,说明药物不良反应占3.8%。结论:一清胶囊的临床研究较为活跃,但随机对照试验质量偏低,临床研究设计需进一步规范,论文撰写水平有待提高。 Objective:To evaluate the quality of references about clinical study of Yiqing capsules, Methods:Related references published during 1990 - 2005 were collected and their quality evaluated according to the standard for evidence degree provided by Oxford Evidence-based Medicine Center and design principles in clinical trials. Results:68.4% references were recommended as B degree and 31.6% as C degree. For evidence level, 26.3% were 2b level, 42.1% were 3b level and 31.6% were 4 degree. 68.4% references were about randomized contrasted trials. 5.3% were about clinical contrasted trials. And 3.8% were about randomized double-blind. References containing intergroup baseline comparisons, diagnosis standard, standard for patient inclusion and exclusion, statistical method, and objective efficacy evaluation were 11.5%, 26.9%, 11.5% , 19.2% and 50%. Side effects were reported in 3.8% references. Conclusion:The clinical effect of Yiqing capsules has been widely studied. However, ratio of randomized contrasted trials was low. Design of clinical research should be standardized and the level of references be improved.
出处 《浙江中西医结合杂志》 2006年第10期597-599,共3页 Zhejiang Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 一清胶囊 临床研究文献 质量评价 Yiqing capsule reference about clinical study quality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

  • 1Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group(EBMWP).Evidence-based medicine:a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine[J].JAMA, 1992,268: 2420-2453.
  • 2Liu JP, Yang M. How trial reports of alternative therapies comply with the CONSORT statement? A literature review on Chinese medicines. 11th Cochrane Colloquium: evidence, health care and culture. Abstract Book, Barcelona, Spain. 2003:50.
  • 3Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276(8):637-639.
  • 4Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet 2001;357(9263):1191-1194.
  • 5Madisch A, Holtmann G, Plein K, et al. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with herbal preparations: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19(3):271-279.
  • 6赖世隆,胡镜清,郭新峰.循征医学与中医药临床研究[J].广州中医药大学学报,2000,17(1):1-8. 被引量:82
  • 7王永炎,刘保延,谢雁鸣.应用循证医学方法构建中医临床评价体系[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2003,9(3):17-23. 被引量:92

共引文献60

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部