期刊文献+

对两种胚泡着床障碍小鼠模型围着床期子宫内膜形态结构的比较研究 被引量:11

A comparative study on peri-implantation endometrial morphologic changes of two embryo implantation dysfunction mice models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较研究米非司酮、吲哚美辛诱导的两种胚泡着床障碍小鼠模型围着床期子宫内膜形态结构。方法将成年♀昆明小鼠交配后随机分为对照组、米非司酮组和吲哚美辛组,于妊娠d8观察小鼠胚泡着床率及平均着床胚泡数,利用光镜和电镜观察子宫内膜的形态结构。结果与对照组相比,米非司酮组和吲哚美辛组其着床率和平均着床胚泡数均降低;米非司酮模型小鼠子宫内膜的发育明显受抑制,吲哚美辛模型小鼠子宫内膜的血管形成受阻。结论米非司酮和吲哚美辛通过对围着床期子宫内膜形态结构不同的影响而复制小鼠胚泡着床障碍模型。 Aim To observe the morphologic changes of peri-implantation endometrium on two mice models of embryo implantation dysfunction comparatively. Methods Sexually mature virgin, Kunming mice were randomly assigned to the control group, Mifepristone model group and Indomethacin model group post-coitally. Two model groups were injected with mifepristone and indomethacin respectively. All animals were sacrificed on day 8 of pregnancy and their uterine horns were examined for the presence of implanted embryos. The morphologic structure of endometrium was observed by light-microscope and electron microscope. Results Compared with the control group, implantation rates and average embryo number significantly decreased both in two models. The development of endometrium in mifepristone group was inhibited, while vascular proliferation of endometrium in indomethacin group was retarded. Conclusion Two models have different effects on peri-implantation endometrial morphologic structure of embryo implantation dysfunction mice.
出处 《中国药理学通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第9期1067-1070,共4页 Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No30171193)
关键词 动物模型 胚泡着床障碍 米非司酮 吲哚美辛 animal model embryo implantation dysfunction mifepristone indomethacin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1吴云霞,黄光英.胚泡着床不全的实验动物模型[J].中国药理学通报,2003,19(4):470-472. 被引量:11
  • 2刘艳娟,黄光英,陆付耳,龚萍,张明敏.小鼠胚泡着床障碍模型的建立[J].中国药理学通报,2003,19(11):1315-1318. 被引量:32
  • 3吴云霞,黄光英,龚萍,刘艳娟.吲哚美辛致小鼠胚泡着床障碍模型的建立[J].中国药理学通报,2005,21(3):373-375. 被引量:15
  • 4Tilley S L,Audoly L P,Hicks E H,et al.Reproductive failure and reduced blood pressure in mice lacking the EP2 prostaglandin E2 receptor[J].J Clin Invest,1999,103(11):1539-45.
  • 5Lessey B A.Adhesion molecules and implantation[J].J Reprod Immunol,2002,55(1-2):101-12.
  • 6董大翠,吴熙瑞,程绍瑜.米非司酮抗着床作用的形态学观察[J].中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志,1999,8(4):403-405. 被引量:6
  • 7Matsumoto H,Ma W,Smalley W,et al.Diversification of cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandins in ovulation and implantation[J].Biol Reprod,2001,64(5):1557-65.
  • 8Lim H,Paria B C,Das S K,et al.Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice[J].Cell,1997,91(2):197-208.
  • 9Matsumoto H,Ma W G,Daikoku T,et al.Cyclooxygenase-2 differentially directs uterine angiogenesis during implantation in mice[J].J Biol Chem,2002,277(32):29260-7.
  • 10Kramer B.Changes in vascular permeability and deciduoma formation during the peri-implantation period of the rat in response to exogenous gonadotropins[J].Anat Rec,1997,247(1):20-4.

二级参考文献12

  • 1翁梨驹.米非司酮的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志,1995,30(9):565-568. 被引量:385
  • 2Chaison G, George M, Lestrat N et al. Effects of the antiprogesterone steroid RU 486 during midluteal phase in normal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1985 ;61(3) :484-89.
  • 3Swahn ML, Bygdeman M, Cekan Set al. The effect of RU 486 administered during the early luteal phase on bleeding pattern, hormonal parameters and endnmetriurn. Hum Reprod, 1990;5(4) :402-8.
  • 4Bauer-Dantoin AC, Tabesh B, Norgle JR etal. RU486 administration blocks neuropeptide Y potentiation of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone-induced LH surges in proestrous rats.Endocrinology, 1993;133(6) :2418-23.
  • 5Greene KE, Kettel LM, Yen SS et al. Interruption of endometrial maturation without hormonal changes by an antiprogesterone during the first half of luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: A contraceptive potential. Fertil Steril, 1992:58(2) :338-43.
  • 6Carson DD, Bagchi I, Dey SK et al.Embryo implantation[J].Dev Bio,2000,223(2): 217-37.
  • 7Kennedy TG, Ross HE. Evidence for a role for prostaylandins in the initiation blastocyst implantation of the rat[J].Bio Repro,1977,16(3):286-91.
  • 8Sookvanichsilp N, Pulbutr P. Anti-implantation effects of indomethacin and celecoxib in rats[J].Contraception,2002,65(5): 373-8.
  • 9Poyser NL, A comparison of the effects of indomethacin and NS-398 on implantation in the rat[J].Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fathy acids,1999,6(5): 297-301.
  • 10Castracane VD, Saksena SK, Shaikh AA. Effects of IVFs, prostaylandins and indomethacin on decidual cell reaction in the rat[J].Prosta,1974,6(5): 397-404.

共引文献52

同被引文献78

引证文献11

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部