期刊文献+

长江口滨岸带生态环境质量评价指标体系与评价模型 被引量:22

INDEX SYSTEM AND MODEL FOR EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN THE YANGTZE ESTUARY-COASTAL ZONE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于生态系统理论,构建了由社会、经济、自然环境、自然灾害4个子系统和7个二级指标及29个三级指标组成的长江口滨岸带生态环境质量评价指标体系;以信息熵理论为基础建立了客观确定指标权重的综合信息熵模型法,并以层次分析法和综合信息熵模型法相结合确定评价指标权重值;采用灰色关联综合评价模型对上海滨岸带生态环境质量进行评价。对上海滨岸带宝山、浦东、南汇、奉贤、金山和崇明岸段1999~2003年5年间生态环境质量的时空变化特征和分级规律的研究表明:宝山滨岸带生态环境质量1999~2000年为较差,2001~2003年为中等;浦东、奉贤、南汇和金山生态环境质量一直处于中等水平;崇明生态环境质量1999、2000年为良,而2001~2003年为中。 The ecosystem of the Yangtze estuary-coastal zone is considered as consisted of four subsystems: society, economic development, natural environment and natural hazard. An integrated indicator system based on these four subsystems has been set up in the present study. Based on Entropy theory, the Information Entropy model (IEM) was established to calculate the weight of every index. The authors established Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) evaluation model to evaluate the ecological environmental quality of Shanghai coastal zone. At last, the coastal zones of Baoshan, Pudong, Nanhui, Fengxian, Jinshan and Chongming (in the Yangtze Estuary) were selected to the characteristics of ecological environmental quality quality in Baoshan coastal-zone was worse than other compare the spatio-temporal change and to classify from 1999 to 2003. The ecological environmental coastal zones during this period, but from 2001 to 2003, the ecological environmental quality was in the medium range. The ecological environment quality in Pudong, Fengxian, Nanhui and Jinshan coastal zones were among the medium level from 1999 to 2003 year. The quality in Chongming Island was in a better situation in 1999 and 2000, but from 2001 to 2003 year it became in the medium.
出处 《长江流域资源与环境》 CAS CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期659-664,共6页 Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(40571006 40131020) 上海市科委项目(05DZ12007 05JC14059) 上海市环保局招标项目资助.
关键词 生态环境 评价指标 灰色关联模型 滨岸带 长江口 ecological environment evaluation index Grey Relational Model coastal zone the Yangtze Estuary
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献31

  • 1刘苑秋.亚热带红壤区生态退化及生态恢复研究综述[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(z1):53-58. 被引量:11
  • 2郭显光.一种新的综合评价方法──组合评价法[J].统计研究,1995,12(5):56-59. 被引量:194
  • 3程春明,朱建平,周泓,赵银慧.城市环境质量综合评价指标体系研究之一综合评价指标体系总报告[J].中国环境监测,1995,11(2):2-9. 被引量:15
  • 4[1]McMichael A J, Bolin B, Costanza R, et al. Globalization and the sustainability of human health: an ecological perspective [J]. Bioscience, 1999,49:205-210.
  • 5[2]Kevan P G, Greco C F. Biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystem health: pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry health [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997,34: 1122-1136.
  • 6[3]Rapport D J, Gandet C L, Calow P. Evaluating and monitoring the health of large scale ecosystem [M]. Berlin: Springer verlag, 1994.
  • 7[4]Nordin M, Azrina L A. Training and research for measuring and monitoring ecosystem health of a large scale ecosystem: the langat basin selangor Malaysia [J]. Ecosystem Health, 1998, 4: 188-190.
  • 8[5]Pietro, Bertollo. Assessing ecosystem health in governed landscape: a framework for developing core indicators [J]. Ecosystem Health, 1998,4:33-51.
  • 9[6]Shear H. The development and use of indicators to assess the state of ecosystem health in the Great Lakes [J]. Ecosystem Health, 1996, 2: 241-258.
  • 10[7]Colin McMulltan. Indicators of Urban Ecosystems Health [EB/OL]. http://www, idrc.ca/ecoheaith/indicators.html. Ottawa. 2000-09-19.

共引文献1476

同被引文献219

引证文献22

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部