地区专业化与产业地理集中的实证分析——以京津冀地区为例被引量：14

Regional Specialization and Geographic Concentration: Empirical Studies of Beiing,Tianjin and Hebei

下载PDF

导出

摘要专业化与地理集中的理论研究主要来源于贸易理论和区位理论,利用专业化与地理集中指数可以衡量其地方的专业化和产业的地理集中度。以京津冀地区为例进行的实证研究,得出以下结论:天津、河北地区2间专业化指数逐年上升,而北京、天津两地的专业化指数则一直处于较低水平。制造业在1993-2004年间,20个行业中有14个行业的地理集中指数呈现大幅度上升,5个行业的指数呈现下降的趋势。在此基础上,需提出促进京津冀区域产业发展和地区分工及一体化的政策建议。 Theoretical explorations into specialization and geographic concentration originated from the theories of trade and location. Using Location Quotient, Krugman regional specialization index and Elison-Glaeser index, we study the regional specialization and geographic concentration of twenty manufacturing industries in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. We find that the specialization index between Tianjin and Hebei increased year by year, but this index between Beijing and Tianjin remained low. The Elison-Glaeser Index of 14 out of the 20 manufacturing industries in question rose tremendously with only 5 industries dowel during the period of 1993-2004. It is argued that these findings can inform the policy-making decisions to promote industrial development and regional specialization and integration in the three regions concerned.

作者踪家峰曹敏

机构地区厦门大学经济研究所

出处《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期122-128,共7页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70303019)

关键词专业化地理集中京津冀地区 specialization, geographic concentration, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regions

分类号 F121.3 [经济管理—世界经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1HELPMAN,E.and KRUGMAN,P.Market Structure and Foreign trade:Increasing Returns,Imperfect Competition and the International Economy[M].Harvester Wheatsheaf:Brighton,1985.
2KRUGMAN,P.Increasing Returns and Economic Geography[J].Journal of Political Economy,1991,vol.99.
3PUGA,D.and VENABLES.The Spread of Industry:Spatial Agglomeration in Economic Development[J].Journal of the Japanese and International Economics,1996,(10).
4PUGA,D.and VENABLES,A.Preferential Trading Arrangements and Industrial Location[J].Journal of International Economics,1997,vol.43.
5ELLISON,G.AND GLAESER,E.Geographic Concentration in U.S.Manufacturing Industries:A Dartboar Approach[J].Journal of Political Economy,1997,(5).
6BRüLHART,M.AND TORSTENSSON,J.Regional Integration,Scale Economies and Industry Location[R].CEPR Discussion Paper No.1435,Centre for Economic Policy Research,1996.
7AMITI,M.New Trade Theories and Industrial Location in the EU:A Survey of Evidence[J].The Oxford Review of Economic Policy,1998,(2).
8BRüLHART,M.Economic Geography,Industry Location and Trade:The Evidence[J].The World Economy,1998,(21).
9MIDELFART-KNARVIK,K.H.,OVERMAN,F.G.,REDDING,S.J.AND VENABLES,A.J.The Location of Europea Industry[R].Economic Papers No.142-Report prepared for the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs,European Commission,2000.
10梁琦.中国制造业分工、地方专业化及其国际比较[J].世界经济,2004,27(12):32-40. 被引量：153

二级参考文献20

1梁琦.《产业集聚论》[M].商务印书馆,2003a..
2Amin A and Thrift N, "The Local in the Global", in Amin A and Thrift N. eds., Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford University Press,Oxford, 1994,pp. 1-22.
3Amiti M. "New Trade Theories and Industrial Location in the EU: A Survey of Evidence". Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998.14(2), pp. 45-53.
4Kim S. " Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: the Trends in U. S. Regional Manufacturing Structure, 1860- 1987." Quarterly,lournal of Economics, 1995, 110(4), PP. 881-908.
5Krugman P. Geography and Trade, 1991, MIT Press,Cambridge MA.
6迈克尔·波特.《国家竞争优势》[M].华夏出版社,2002年版..
7保罗·克鲁格曼.《地理与贸易》[M].北京大学出版社,2001..
8Amiti, M. , 1998, "New Trade Theories and Industrial Location in the EU: A Survey of Evidence", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v.14, iss.2, pp.45-53.
9Audretsch, D. B. and Feldman, P. M. , 1996, " R&D Spillover and the Geography of Innovation and Production", American Economic Review, v.86, iss.3, pp.630-640.
10Clancy, P. , Malley, E. and Connell, L. , et al, 2001, "Industry Clusters in Ireland: An Application of Porter' s Model of National Competitive Advantage to Three Sectors", European Planning Studies, v. 9, iss. 1, pp. 7-28.