期刊文献+

“自我解释”的类型、影响因素及产生机制 被引量:1

TYPE,INTERACTION AND MECHANISM OF SELF-EXPLANATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自我解释是一种由自我产生并指向自我的知识建构活动。领域性知识、加工方式、引导角色及激励都会影响自我解释的发生。其产生机制主要有三种模型:空缺填补理论认为自我解释是学生发现自己的知识漏洞并对这些漏洞进行弥补的过程;产生推论及修复心理模型的双加工机制认为自我解释是对不完整文本进行推论和对不完整的心理模型进行修复的过程;拓展情境模式通过比较前两种模式,认为自我解释是修复个人已有的、存在缺陷的领域,在不替代原有心理模型的基础上加速该模型的改变。 Seli - explaining is a knowledge-constructed activity produced by oneself and directing to oneself. Domain knowledge, processing method, inductor and promoting can affect self-explanation. There are three models about self-explanation. Gap-filling hypothesis points out that self-explanation is the process of students researching for their knowledge hole and making up for these holes. The Dual Processes of generating Inferences and repairing mental models think that self-explanation is the process of making up for half-baked texts and half-baked psychology models compared with the previous two models, enriching situation model thinks that self-explanation can repair half-baked, old, individual domain and accelerate its change without replacing old psychology model.
作者 何敏 刘电芝
出处 《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2006年第5期102-105,共4页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部"十五"重点规划课题的资助(项目批准号:DHA010261)
关键词 自我解释 领域性知识 机制 心理模型 self-explaining domain knowledge mechanism mental model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Chi M T H. Knowledge structures and memory development. In: R Siegler(Ed.). Children' s thinking:What develop? Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978:73-96.
  • 2Chi M T H, Feltovich P, Glasser R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Sciences, 1981, 1: 121- 152.
  • 3Chi M T H. Self- explaining expository texts: the dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In: R Glaser (Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000: 161- 238.
  • 4Chi M T H, Bassok M, Lewis M W, Reimann P, Glaser R. Self - explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 1989, 13: 145-182.
  • 5Chi M T H. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences,1997, 6(3) :271- 315.
  • 6Ericsson K A, Simon H A. Protocol analysis (Revised).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
  • 7Wathen S H. Collaborative versus individualistic learning and the role of explanations. Doctoral thesis. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh, 1997.
  • 8Chi M T H, DeLeeuw N, Chiu M H, LaVancher C.Eliciting self- explanations improves understanding.Cognitive Science, 1994, 18:439-477.
  • 9VanLehn K, Jones R M. Learning by explaining examples to oneself: A computational model. In: SChipman & A L Meyrowitz (Eds.). Foundations of knowledge acquisition: Cognitive models of complex learnin. g Boston: Kluwer, 1993: 25 - 82.
  • 10VanLehn K, Jones R M. What mediates the selfexplanation effect? Knowledge gaps, schemas or analogies?. In: M Polson (Ed.). Poceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsddale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993: 1034-1039.

共引文献25

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部