期刊文献+

环境话语中委婉修辞法的生态批评 被引量:2

An Ecological Criticism on Euphemism in Environmental Discourse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 迄今有关委婉修辞法的研究主要集中于其正面功能。生态角度的批评性分析表明,委婉语在环境话语中的使用可以起到掩盖环境问题的严重性、规避环境问题的责任、宣扬对环境进行商业利用等负面功能。这种环境意识上的误导,显然不利于对环境的保护与环境问题的解决。 So far, studies on euphemism have centered on its positive functions. However, there is no oneone relationship between a linguistic form and its micro-function. An ecological criticism on euphemism shows that the device may have its negative functions when employed in environmental discourse, such as playing down the seriousness of environmental problems, avoiding responsibility for these problems, and favoring commercial use of the environment. Such misleading in environment awareness is obviously unfavorable for the protection of our environment or the solution of environmental problems.
作者 朱长河
出处 《安徽教育学院学报》 2006年第5期95-97,共3页 Journal of Anhui Institute of Education
基金 浙江省社科联重点课题阶段性研究成果(05Z41)
关键词 委婉语 环境 生态批评 euphemism environment ecological criticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Halliday, M. A. K. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics[J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1990, (6).
  • 2Muhlhatisler, P. Language of Environment : Environment of Language : A Course in Ecolinguistics [M].London:Battlebridge, 2003.
  • 3Fill, A. Language and ecology:Ecolinguistic perspectives for 2000 and beyond [M]// D. Graddol. Applied Linguistics for the 21st Century. London:Catchline, 2001.
  • 4Bussmann, H. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics [Z]. London: Routledge, 1996.
  • 5朱长河.有标记的选择与意图义:标记模式的语言学理论探源[J].外语学刊,2005(5):59-62. 被引量:10
  • 6Schultz, B. Language and the natural environment[M]//Fil;, A. & P. Muhlhaiusler. The Ecolinguistics Reader : Language, Ecology and Environment. London and New York: Continuum, 2001.
  • 7Trampe, W. Language and ecological crisis : Extracts from a dictionary of industrial agriculture [A]. Fill, A. &. P. Muhlhausler, 2001
  • 8Kahn, M. The passive voice of science: Language abuse in the wildlife profession [A]. Fill, A. &P. Muhlhauslor. 2001

二级参考文献17

  • 1王寅.标记象似性[J].外语学刊,1998(3):51-56. 被引量:96
  • 2Bussman, H. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics[M]. London: Loutledge,1996.
  • 3Croft, W. Typology and Universals (second edition)[M]. Cambridge: CUP, 2003.
  • 4Gal, S. The political economy of code choice[A]. In Heller, M (ed.). Codeswitching[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988.
  • 5Givon, T. Functionalism and Grammar[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995.
  • 6Haiman, J. Natural Syntax[M]. Cambridge: CUP, 1985.
  • 7Haspelmath, M. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations[A]. In Comrie, B and M. Polinsky (eds.). Causatives and transitivity[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1993:87-120.
  • 8Jakobson,R.Efforts toward a means-end model of language[A].载《雅柯布森文集》[C].钱军、王力译.2001.长沙:湖南教育出版社,1963:85-90.
  • 9Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. London: Longman, 1983.
  • 10Myers- Scotton, C. (ed.). Codes and Consequences: Choosing Linguistic Varieties[C]. New York/Oxford: OUP, 1998.

共引文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部