期刊文献+

“五四”时期的新、旧戏剧观论争及其现代性追求述论 被引量:6

Debate on Theatre Innovation and Its Pursuit of Modernity during May theFourth Movement
原文传递
导出
摘要 发生在“五四”时期的新、旧戏剧观念论争是不可避免的,因为它是时代及戏剧发展的必然。“五四”时期的这场关于新、旧戏剧观的论争,从学理上看更近似于一场关于戏剧现代性追求的论争。以胡适等为代表的《新青年》派着力从外部以矫枉过正的方式强行推行戏剧的启蒙现代性进程;以张厚载等为代表的保守派则主要于审美的范畴内进行戏曲的现代化追求。从时代性这一层面而言,《新青年》派更具时代的进步意义,但保守派的理论主张也别具历史的合理性。 The controversy over the Old and New concepts of theatre in the May-Fourth movement was the inevitable outcome of the evolution of history and the development of theatre. The controversy can be viewed as a debate on the pursuit of modemity in theatre. The New Youth circle represented by Hu Shi, exerted themselves in a radical and forced pursuit of the enlightenment modemity, while the conservatives represented by Zhang Houzai favored an aesthetic approach to the reform of the traditional theatre along the lines of modemity. While the New Youths should be considered progressive in their endeavor, the conservatives must also be viewed with respect for their kind of rationality.
作者 王良成
机构地区 南京大学中文系
出处 《戏剧(中央戏剧学院学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期24-29,共6页 Drama:The Journal of the Central Academy of Drama
关键词 “五四”戏剧观 启蒙现代性 审美现代性 May-Fourth Movement concept of theatre enlightenment modemity aesthetic modemity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1吕天成.曲品·卷上[A].中国古典戏曲论著集成(六)[C].北京:中国戏剧出版社,1959.
  • 2陈独秀.随感录(十)[J].新青年,1918,.
  • 3周作人.《论中国旧戏之应废》[J].新青年,1918,.
  • 4钱玄同.今之所谓剧评家[J].新青年,1918,(3).
  • 5林毓生.中国意识的危机—“五四”时期激烈的反传统主义[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1988.
  • 6胡适.“胡适致任鸿隽”(1916,7,26.).新文学史料,1991,(4).
  • 7傅斯年.戏剧改良各面观.新青年,1918,5(4).
  • 8亚里斯多德 陈中梅译.诗学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.38.
  • 9钱玄同.《随感录十八》[J].新青年,1918,5.
  • 10钱玄同.“钱玄同致陈独秀”[J].新青年,1917,(3).

共引文献79

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部