摘要
目前,立法仅确认人身保险合同存在受益人。这样的规定必然带来困惑,即不适用于财产保险。受益人范围扩展至财产保险合同具有客观与理论上的可行性;大陆地区保险法规定受益人由被保险人或者投保人指定,但投保人指定受益人须经被保险人同意,台湾地区保险法没有该限制,被保险人或者投保人均可指定受益人。
The current Chinese law only acknowledges the existence of the beneficiary to personal insurance contracts. It is confusing that this provision does not apply to property insurance contracts. It is objectively and theoretically possible to extend the beneficiary provision to property insurance contracts. The Chinese Insurance Law prescribes that the insurance beneficiary is designated by the insured or the applicant, but the applicant's designation should obtain the insured's prior consent. In contrast, there is no such restriction in Taiwan's Insurance Law. Both the insured and the applicant can designate the beneficiary.
出处
《保险研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第8期68-70,共3页
Insurance Studies
关键词
海峡两岸
受益人
财产保险
cross-straits
beneficiary
property insurance