期刊文献+

长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效观察 被引量:2

A Clinical Observation of Vinorelbine Combined with Cisplatin in the Treatment of Advanced Stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察长春瑞滨联合顺铂(NP方案)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及毒副作用。方法:42例经病理或细胞学诊断为非小细胞肺癌患者,其中腺癌4例,鳞癌38例。TNM分期Ⅲ期23例,Ⅳ期19例。所有病例均为初治。采用国产长春瑞滨25mg/m^2,第1、8天静滴;顺铂(DDP)30mg/m^2第1~3天静滴,28d为一个周期。治疗至少2个周期后进行疗效和毒性反应评价。结果:完全缓解(CR)3例,部分缓解(PR)15例,稳定(SD)16例,进展(PD)8例,总有效率(CR+PR)为42.9%。主要毒副反应为白细胞减少及胃肠道反应,其Ⅲ、Ⅳ度白细胞下降占11.9%,呕吐发生率为54.7%。结论:长春瑞滨联合顺铂(NP方案)治疗晚期NSCLC疗效确切,毒副反应可耐受。 Objective: To observe the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine combined with cisplatin (NP regimen) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods:42 patients with advanced NSCLC were confirmed by pathology or cytology. There were 4 patients with lung adenocarcinoma,38 with squamous carcinoma. 23 patients had stage Ⅲ diease and 19 patients had stage Ⅳ. All patients had no prior chemotherapy. NVB were used 25 mg per centiare on days 1 and days 8;DDP were used 30 mg per centiare on days 1 to days 3. A Period includes 28 days. to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity after 2 periods at least. Results:Complete response was observed in 3 patients and partial response was observed in 15 patients. The overall response rate was 42.9%. The main tocicity was leucopenia and vomiting. The dose limiting toxicity was neutropenia that was observed in 83.3% of the patients(11.9% in grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ). About 54.7% of the patients was observed vomitting. Conclusions: The results indicate NP regimen for advanced NSCLC is promise,and the toxicities are tolerable.
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2006年第9期32-34,37,共4页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 长春瑞滨 顺铂 化疗 non-all-cell lung cancer vinorelbine cisplatin chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1CHEVALIER T L,BRISGAND D,DOURLLARD J Y,et at.Randomized Study of Vinorebline and Cisplatin Versus Vindesine and Cisplatin Versus Vinorebline Alone in Advanced non-small-cell Lung Cancer:Results of a European Multicenter Trial Including 612Patients[J].Clin Oncol,1994,12(2):360-367.
  • 2张湘茹,孙燕,孔维红,周生余,冯奉仪.去甲长春花碱加顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌42例[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1998,20(1):60-62. 被引量:527
  • 3储大同,屈凤莲,张湘茹,李峻岭,罗杨.NP和MVP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,1999,26(12):914-917. 被引量:44
  • 4GRARIDO LOPEZ M P,LAGO L,GONZALEZ-LARRIBA L,et al.Neoadjuvant Che-motherapy with Gemcitabine(GEM),Cisplatin(CIS)and Docetaxel(DOC) in Stage Ⅲ AN2 and T4N0 non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients:Spanish Lung Cancer Group Phase Ⅱ Trial 9901[J].Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2003,22:2 620.
  • 5ANTONIO S,REBECCA P,ALBERTO T,et al.Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Stage ⅢAN2/Ⅲ B Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).A Multicenter Phase Ⅱ Study with a 21 Days Schedule:Final Results[J].Pro Am Soc Clin Oncol,2003,22:2 669.
  • 6CARTEI G,CARTEI F,CANTONE A,et al.Cisplatin-cyclo-phoshamide-mito-mycin Combination Chemotherapy in with Supportive Care Versus Supportive Care Alone for Treatment of Metastatic Non-small-cell[J].Lung Cancer.J Nat Cancer Inst,1993,85:794-800.
  • 7HELSING M,BERGMAN B,THANING L,et al.Quality of Life and Survival in Patients with Advanced non-small-cell lung Cancer Receiving Supportive care Plus Chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Etoposide or Supportive Care Only[J].Eur J Cancer,1998,34:1 036-1 044.
  • 8LE CHEVALIVER T,BRISGAND D,PUJOL J L.et al.Randomized Study of Navelbine Registered and Cisplatin Versus Vindesine and Cisplatin Versus Navelbine Registered Alone in 612 Patients with Advanced Non-samll-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)[J].Bull Cancer,1996,83:385-394.
  • 9潘启超.长春碱类的新进展──失碳长春碱[J].癌症,1996,15(3):228-231. 被引量:276
  • 10张弓,周云峰,伍钢.国产及进口长春瑞滨加顺铂治疗非小细胞肺癌近期疗效[J].中国癌症杂志,2002,12(2):160-161. 被引量:6

二级参考文献8

共引文献719

同被引文献20

  • 1熊飞.长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌47例疗效观察[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2004,9(5):469-470. 被引量:4
  • 2肖春英,梁孝印,付孟莉.长春新碱临床研究进展[J].社区医学杂志,2004,2(5):33-34. 被引量:7
  • 3姚文秀,魏阳,周行,王更利,杨继红.长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗32例多柔比星耐药的晚期乳腺癌[J].中国癌症杂志,2004,14(6):553-554. 被引量:2
  • 4Kurup A,Hanna NH.Treatment of small cell lung cancer[J].Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2004,52(2):117-126.
  • 5Pignon JP,Tribodet H,Scagliotti GV,et al.Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation:a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(21):3552-3559.
  • 6Douillard J Y,Rosell R,De LM,et al.Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-ⅢA non-small-cell lung cancer(Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association[ANITA]):a randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2006,7(9):719-727.
  • 7Winton T,Livingston R,Johnson D,et al.Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs.observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer[J].N Eng J Med,2005,352(25):2589-2597.
  • 8Scagliotti GV,Parikh P,von Pawel J,et al.PhaseⅢstudy comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(21):3543-3551.
  • 9Kreuter M,Vansteenkiste J,Fischer JR,et al.Randomized phase2 trial on refinement of early-stage NSCLC adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus cisplatin and vinorelbine:the TREAT study[J].Ann Oncol,2013,24(4):986-992.
  • 10Adjei AA.Pharmacology and mechanism of action of pemetrexed[J].Clin Lung Cancer,2004,Suppl2:51-55.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部