摘要
本文意在通过对德国的预告登记和日本、韩国的假登记制度进行比较考察,指出两种制度的异同,以此揭示预告登记制度与假登记制度是否为同一种制度。通过分析,笔者的观点与主流观点有差异,认为德国与韩国的制度在根本上是一致的,但日本的假登记担保制度则是一种“流质”性质的担保。在文章的最后一部分,笔者指出了两种制度在我国的借鉴意义。
By compareing the preliminary registration in Germany with the false registration in Japan and South Korea, this paper displays the similarities and differences between the two systems. The author holds different viewpoints from those of most other scholars as she has reconsiderd the the preliminary registration in Germany similar to the false registration in Korea, while the false registration in Japan is completely different with the system in Germany and Korea. Finally, the author suggest that our country shuold take these two systems for reference.
出处
《宁波广播电视大学学报》
2006年第3期67-70,共4页
Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
关键词
预告登记
假登记
流质契约
Preliminary registration
False registration
Fluidity contract