期刊文献+

市场化与国家规制——转型期城镇劳动力市场中的收入分配 被引量:70

Marketization and State Regulation: Income Distribution in the Urban Labor Market during the Period of Transition
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究透过职业阶层、教育与政治资本三个重要因素,侧重分析了市场化改革过程中国家力量对劳动力市场中收入分配的影响。在国家规制影响较大的劳动力市场部门,职业阶层间收入差距较小;人力资本回报的提高受国家改革计划的影响明显。而在新生的市场经济部门,不仅阶层间收入不平等扩展迅速,而且体力劳动者的市场境遇也大大低于国有部门和集体部门。由于更多地受国家政治过程的影响,政治资本对改革后新生代劳动力工资收益的影响呈现出随进入劳动力市场时间的推后而快速下降的态势。 The impact of state power on income distribution in the labor market in the marketazation process is analyzed using three important factors: social class, education and political capital. The income gaps are narrower across occupational strata in labor market sectors that have more state regulation. The impact of the state reform agenda is obvious in the growth of returns to human capital. In the new market economic sector, not only has there been rapid growth in the class inequality of income, but manual workers' situation in the labor market is much worse than that of their counterparts in the state-owned and collective sectors. The greater influence of the state political process is seen in the post-reform new generation labor force: the later they enter the labor market, the less impact political capital has on them.
作者 刘精明
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期110-124,共15页 Social Sciences in China
基金 中国人民大学社会学系与香港科技大学社会科学部的合作项目"全国综合社会调查(CGSS2003)"的支持。
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1孙立平.《从“市场转型理论”到关于不平等的制度主义理论》[J].中国书评,1995,.
  • 2李春玲:《断裂与碎片》第1章,中国社会科学出版社,2005年
  • 3刘欣.市场转型与社会分层:理论争辩的焦点和有待研究的问题[J].中国社会科学,2003(5):102-110. 被引量:55
  • 4V. Nee, A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism, American Sociological Review. vol. 54(5) (Oct. 1989)
  • 5V. Nee, Social Inequalities in Reforming State Socialism:Between Redistribution and Markets in China, American Sociological Review, vol. 56 (3) (Jun. 1991)
  • 6V. Nee, and Rebecca Matthews, Market Transition and Societal Transformation in Reforming State Socialism. AnnualReview of Sociology, vol. 22 (1996).
  • 7Y. Xie, E. Hannum, Regional Variation in Earnings Inequality in Reform-Era Urban China. American Journal of Sociology. vol. 101 (4) (1996), pp. 950-992
  • 8X. Zhou, Reply: Beyond the Debate and Toward Substantive Institutional Analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 105(4) (2000):pp.1190-1195
  • 9X. Wu, Y. Xie, Does the Market Pay Off? Earnings Returns to Education in Urban China.American Sociological Review, vol. 68 (3) (2003), p. 425
  • 10Y. Xie, X. Wu, Market Premium, Social Process, and Statistical Naivety: Further Evidence on Differential Returns to Education in Urban China.American Journal of Sociology, vol. 111, no. 2 (2006).

二级参考文献111

共引文献776

同被引文献1458

引证文献70

二级引证文献1216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部