非法证据排除规则的实证研究——以法院处理刑讯逼供辩护为例

A Positive Study of Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence: Cases Concerning Using Torture to Coerce a Confession

中国三个地区法院处理刑讯逼供辩护案件处理情况的调研结果表明,非法证据排除规则在司法实践中处于尴尬境地。其中有立法技术方面的原因,也有司法制度和价值观念层面的原因,因此,在完善非法证据排除规则上,不能仅限于证据规则层面的努力,而应该在更广阔的视野中进行改革,以推动相关配套制度的完善。

By investigating the cases concerning using torture to coerce a confession tried by the courts in China＇ s three regions, one can find that the exclusionary rules are in a dilemma in judicial practice, which is due to technical reasons as well as judicial systematic elements and notions of value. Therefore, while improving the exclusionary rules, we cannot only concentrate on the rules themselves. Efforts should be exerted to reform the relevant systems and institutions in a wider area.