司法赔偿中确认程序之检讨及前瞻

Self-criticism and Foresight of Affirmation Procedure in Judicial Compensation

在我国《国家赔偿法》中,确认程序是赔偿请求人获得司法赔偿的必经程序,然而由于现行的司法赔偿的确认程序存在着主体中立性不足、确认期限缺省、确认标准模糊、确认救济途径单一等诸多不足,使得确认程序遭致广泛的批评。对待确认程序的理性态度是揭示出其生成的宪政体制因素,并以此为基础将现行司法赔偿确认程序设计成可选择的程序,并在人大中设立最终处理机关。

In China＇s Compensation Law, affirmation procedure is the indispensable process for the compensation claimants to get the state compensation. However the current affirmation procedure has been criticized widely for the following inadequacies such as the shortage of subject neutrality, lack of confirmation terms, faint confirmation standard and a single relief path. The rational attitude to treat the confirmation procedure is to find the factor of constitution system, and take this as the foundation to design the current judicial compensation procedure as alternative procedure and establish the terminal operation organization in the National People＇ s Congress.