期刊文献+

实物期权:我国中小企业信息化投资决策的必然选择 被引量:1

Physical options:the necessary choice for SME investment decision-making information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信息化是中小企业迎接新经济的挑战,提高企业运作效率、降低经营管理成本、把握新的商业机会的必由之路。但传统的投资决策方法无法根据信息化投资的特点来把握好投资的时机、方向、重点和结构。通过比较分析,认为实物期权方法作为一种动态评估方法,更能适应中小企业信息化投资特点。运用实物期权方法对中小企业信息化投资决策进行分析,可以突破传统决策分析方法的束缚,大大降低投资风险,增强投资的科学性。 Infoarmationization is the final and only way for SMEs to meet the challenges of the new economy, improve enterprise efficiency,reduce management costs,and seize new business opportunities. However,the traditional methods of investment decision-making can not be effectively to have a good grasp of the investment opportunity, direction,focus and structure.based on the characteristics of information technology investment. This paper, through a comparative analysis, argues that physical options, as a dynamic evaluative method,can hold for information-friendly investment of SMEs,and that applying this method to the decision-making analysis for information-friendly investment of SMEs can break through the bondage of traditional decision-making analysis so that investment risk can be greatly reduced and scientific investment increased.
作者 鲍旭红
出处 《科技与管理》 2006年第5期96-98,共3页 Science-Technology and Management
关键词 中小企业 信息化投资 净现值法 实物期权 small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) investment based on information net cash law physical options
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

共引文献46

同被引文献19

  • 1冯其友,姜锦虎.信息技术/系统(IT/IS)应用效果评估方法综述[J].情报科学,2005,23(3):467-472. 被引量:6
  • 2郝晓玲,于秀艳.信息系统绩效评价体系研究综述[J].商业研究,2005(19):51-54. 被引量:13
  • 3于秀艳.信息系统绩效评价研究综述[J].现代情报,2006,26(8):90-92. 被引量:5
  • 4[1]Farbey B.,Land F.and Targett D.,1993.How to Assess your IT investment:A Study of Methods and Practices Management Today[M].But-terworth-Heinemann,Oxford.
  • 5[2]Remenyi D.,Money A.,Sherwood-Smith M.and Irani Z.,2000.The Effective Measurement and Management of IT Costs and Benefits′[M].Butterworth Heinemann,London.
  • 6[3]Irani Z.,EzingeardJ.N GrieveBJ.,1998.Costing the true costs of IT/IS investments:a focus during management decision making[J].Journal of Logistics and Information Management,11(1)38-43
  • 7[4]Petter Gottsehalk,2001.Key issues in IS management in Norway:An empirical study based on Q methodology[J].Information Resources Man-agement Journal,Vol.14,Iss.2.
  • 8[6]Mahmood,Mo Adam,Mann,Gary J.,1993.Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment:An exploratory study[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,Vol.10,Iss.1.
  • 9[7]Egon Berghout,2001.Methodologies for IT investment evaluation:a review and assessment[M].Idea Group Publishing,3.p78-93.
  • 10[10]Barry L.Myers.Information systems assessment-Development of a comprehensive:framework and contingency theory to assess the effective-ness of the information systems function[D].UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS.2003.8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部