期刊文献+

信用风险内部模型评价 被引量:1

Evaluating Internal Credit Risk Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着金融风险数量化研究的深入与发展,研究者给出了形式各异的信用风险度量模型,这些模型依赖不同的假设和信用数据基础。如何在诸多模型中选择适用于自身风险度量的工作就显得十分重要。本文首先介绍Z-计分和EDF模型,然后利用AR方法对这些信用风险度量模型的预测精度进行比较分析,发现对于所选定样本AR值能较好的反映两个模型的预测精度。 Various credit risk modeling approaches have been developed in the past few years. But these models are based on different assumptions and credit data. So, it is very important to choose the suitable one for risk measures among the models. This paper introduces the Z- score model and EDF model, and then compares the forecast accuracy of these models by the Accuracy Ratios(AR). From the selected samples, we find that the AR can preferably reflect the accuracy of both models.
机构地区 中国人民大学
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第9期58-61,共4页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家社科基金(05BJL028)资助
关键词 Z-计分模型 EDF模型 精度比 z- score model EDF model accuracy ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Altman E I Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy [J]. Journal of Finance, 1968, (23) :589 - 609.
  • 2Altman E I and Saunders. A Credit Risk Measurement : Developments over the Last Twenty Years [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1998, (21) : 1721 - 1742.
  • 3Crosbie P J and Bohn J R. Modeling Default Risk[M]. KMV, LLC, 2002.
  • 4Black F and Scholes M. The Pricing of Options Corporate Liabilities [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, (81) : 637 - 654.
  • 5Keenan C and Sobehart R. Performance Measures for Credit Risk Models[M]. Moody's Investors Services, 2000.
  • 6Caouettee J B, Altman E I and Narayanan P. Managing Credit Risk : the Next Great Financial Challenge[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001.

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部