期刊文献+

算术应用题表征策略的眼动研究 被引量:10

REPRESENTATION OF ARITHMETIC WORD PROBLEMS:EVIDENCE FROM UNDERGRADUATES′EYE FIXATIONS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用EyelinkⅡ眼动记录仪,以21名大学生为被试,探讨了大学生解决三步比较应用题的表征策略。实验设计为2(正确率:高、低)×2(题型:一致、不一致)×2(无关信息:插入、未插入)的三因素混合实验。结果表明:(1)大学生被试解三步式比较应用题存在直译策略和问题模型策略;(2)解题正确率高者解难度较大的应用题时倾向于对应用题情境进行加工,即采用问题模型策略,正确率低者未表现出这一倾向,往往采用直译策略。 In the current study Eyelink il Eye tracking system was used to examine the arithmetic word problems representation strategies of 21 undergraduates. The experiment was a mixed design, 2 (successful or unsuccessful) ×2 (consistent or inconsistent)×2 (with or without outlying information) . The between factor was successful or unsuccessful subject, the within factors were consistency problem or inconsistency problem which had three steps, and whether plugged the outlying information. During the experiment, subjects were asked to recall the target word problems. The results indicated that when undergraduates represented the three-step problems, the strategies they used includs direct translation strategy and problem model strategy. When solving the more difficult word problems, successful undergraduates were inclined to process the situation of the word problem, called problem model strategy, while unsuccessful undergraduates were inclined to use direct translation strategy.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 2006年第3期188-193,共6页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地01JAZJDXLX003和02JAZJDXLX004重大项目 全国教育科学"十五"规划国家青年基金CBA01022项目 天津市科委科技发展计划项目 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"的资助。
关键词 三步比较应用题 直译策略 问题模型策略 眼动 three-step word problems, direct-translation strategy, problem-model strategy, eye movement.
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Mayer R E,Larkin J H,Kadane J B.A cognitive analysis of mathematical problem-solving ability.In R.J.Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence.Vol (2),Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.1984,231~273
  • 2[2]Mayer R E.Mathematical ability.In R.J.Sternberg (Ed.),Human Abilities:An Information Processing Approach.San Francisco,CA:Freeman.1985,127~150
  • 3[3]Lewis A B,Mayer R E.Students miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems.Journal of Educational Psychology,1987,79:363~371
  • 4[4]Lewis A B.Training students to represent arithmetic word problems.Journal of Educational Psychology,1989,81:521~531
  • 5[5]Kinstch W,Greeno J G.Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems.Psychological Review,1985,92 (1):109~129
  • 6[6]Morean S,Coquin-Viennot D.Comprehension of arithmetic word problems by fifth-grade pupils:Representations and selection of information.British Journal of Educational Psychology.2003,73:109~121
  • 7[7]Hegarty M,Mayer R E,Green C E.Comprehension of arithmetic word problems:Evidence form students' eye fixations.Journal of Educational Psychology,1992,84:76~84
  • 8[8]Hegarty M,Mayer R E,Christopher A M.Comprehension of arithm(e)tic word problems:A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers.Journal of Educational Psychology.1995,87 (1):18~32
  • 9陈英和,仲宁宁,田国胜,王治国.小学2~4年级儿童数学应用题表征策略差异的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2004,20(4):19-24. 被引量:29
  • 10路海东,董妍.小学生表征数学应用题策略的实验研究[J].心理发展与教育,2003,19(1):60-63. 被引量:22

二级参考文献18

  • 1刘儒德.在CAI下即时提示解题过程对小学三年级学生建构两步应用题整体结构的影响[J].心理发展与教育,1997,13(2):19-24. 被引量:3
  • 2张庆林,管鹏.小学生表征应用题的元认知分析[J].心理发展与教育,1997,13(3):13-16. 被引量:36
  • 3纪桂萍,焦书兰,何海东.小学生数学问题解决与心理表征[J].心理发展与教育,1996,12(1):29-32. 被引量:29
  • 4Siegler R S.Children’S Thinking.Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall.1998:150—167.
  • 5Steinberg R J,Talia B Z.The Nature of Mathematical Thinking.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1996:27—79.
  • 6Hegarty M,Mayer R E,Monk C A.Comprehension of Arithmetie Word Problem:A Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Problem Solvers.Journal of Eduemional Psychology,1995,87(1):18—32.
  • 7Hegarty M,Mayer R E,Green C E.Comprehension of Arithmetie Word Problems Evidence From Students’Eye Fixations.Journal of Educational Psychology,1992,84(1):76—84.
  • 8Maccoby E E,Jacklin C N.The psychology of sex differences. Stanford,CA:Stanford Univ.Press,1974.
  • 9Hiebert J.Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge:The Case of Mathemafics.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1986.
  • 10Hiebert J,Weame D.Instruction,Understanding,and Skill in Muhidigit Addition and Subtraction.Cognition and Instruction,1996,14:251—283.

共引文献42

同被引文献124

引证文献10

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部