期刊文献+

结直肠癌患者经腹腔镜手术后短期疗效和安全性的荟萃分析 被引量:36

Meta-analysis of short-term efficacy and safety after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价结直肠癌腹腔镜手术的短期疗效和安全性。方法检索2005年12月前已公开发表的比较结直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开腹手术短期临床效应差异的前瞻性随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCT)。按纳入和排除标准筛选后进行质量评分,提取短期临床效应指标,进行荟萃分析。结果 9项 RCT 纳入荟萃分析,平均质量评分(7.6±0.6)分。腹腔镜手术组与开腹手术组患者基本特征均衡。较之开腹手术组,腹腔镜手术组切口长度减少12 cm[95% CI(-13.51~-10.49),P<0.01],出血量较开腹手术组减少约75 ml[95%CI(-86.06~-62.99),P<0.01],但是手术时间延长42 min[95% CI(32.18~52.50),P<0.01]。标本长度、切缘阳性率及淋巴结检出数量等,两组差异均无统计学意义。两组患者术中并发症、术后总体并发症和具体并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。腹腔镜手术组患者术后第一天疼痛更轻[加权均数差 WMD=-0.80,95%CI(-1.26~-0.34),P<0.01],肠外镇痛药使用量更少[标准化均数差 SMD=-0.31,95%CI(-0.42~-0.21),P<0.01],同时其术后排气时间、肠蠕动恢复时间、饮食恢复时间及出院时间均早于开腹手术组患者(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术可安全地根治结直肠癌,对患者的创伤亦明显减少。 Objective To evaluate the short-term curative effects and safety of laparoscopic resection (LR) in treatment of colorectal cancer. Methods The databases PubMed, Embase, CCTR, and CBMdisc were retrieved and 15 medical journals published in different countries were retrieved manually to search the literatures related to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparison between the effects and safety of LR and open resection (OR) in treatment of colorectal cancer that were published before the end of 2005. After selected based on the inclusion and exclusion standards, the valid literature were appraised by 2 reviewers independently. Results Nine articles, with a mean quality score of 7. 6 ± 0. 6 were included into the meta-analysis. The baseline characteristics of the LR group were similar to those of the OR group. In comparison with the OR group, the incision length of the LR group was shorter by 12 cm [95% CI ( - 13.51, - 10.49), P 〈0.01], blood loss was less by 75 ml [95% CI ( -86.06, -62. 99), P 〈0. 01 ], intensity of pain in the first day after operation was lower [ weight mean deviation = -0. 80, 95% CI ( - 1.26, - 0. 34), P 〈 0. 01 ] , parenteral narcotic requirement was lower [ standard mean deviation = - 0. 31, 95% CI ( - 0. 42, - 0. 21 ), P 〈 0. 01 ] , and average times before the postoperative first flatus, first bowel movement, and diet resumption, and discharge were all shorter ( all P 〈 0. 05 ) ; however, the operation time was longer by 42 min[ 95% CI ( 32. 18, 52. 50 ), P 〈 0. 01 ]. There were no significant differences in the length of resected specimen, positive rate of resection margin, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and morbidity rates of intra-operative and post-operative complications. Conclusion With faster recovery and less pain compared with OR, LR is safe and effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
机构地区 [
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第35期2485-2490,共6页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 结肠直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 随机对照试验 数据说明 统计 Colorectal neoplasms Laparoscopy Randomized controlled trials Data Interpretation, statistical
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Jacobs M,Verdeja JC,Goldstein HS.Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).Surg Laparosc Endosc,1991,1:144-150.
  • 2Monson JR,Darzi A,Carey PD,et al.Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients.Lancet,1992,340:831-833.
  • 3Ah-See KW,Molony NC.A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology.J Laryngol Otol,1998,112:460-463.
  • 4Begg C,Cho M,Eastwood S,et al.Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials.The CONSORT statement.JAMA,1996,276:637-639.
  • 5Schwenk W,Haase O,Neudecker J,et al.Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2005,20:CD003145.
  • 6Moher D,Cook DJ,Eastwood S,et al.Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials:the QUOROM statement.Br J Surg,2000,87:1448-1454.
  • 7MRC CLASICC trial group.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial.Lancet,2005,365:1718-1726.
  • 8Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR).Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.Lancet Oncol,2005,6:477-484.
  • 9Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group.A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.N Engl J Med,2004,350:2050-2059.
  • 10Leung KL,Kwok SP,Lam SC,et al.Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma:prospective randomised trial.Lancet,2004,363:1187-1192.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Min-HuaZheng BoFeng Ai-GuoLu Jian-WenLi Ming-LiangWang Zhi-HaiMao Yan-YanHu FengDong Wei-GuoHu Dong-HuaLi LuZang Yuan-FeiPeng Bao-MingYu.Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(3):323-326. 被引量:35
  • 2Anonymous. E9. Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials,September 16,1998.
  • 3Klaus Hinkelmann, Oscar Kempthome. Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1994:36.
  • 4Curtis L Meinert. Clinical Trials Dictionary Terminology and Usage Recommendations The Johns Hopkins Center for Clinical Trials 1996:84.
  • 5周海钧主译.药品注册的国际技术要求-临床部分[M].人民卫生出版社,2001.261-314.
  • 6Grimm & PR Yarnold. Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics. The American Psychological Association 1995;350.
  • 7Wayne W Danniel. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences 6^th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1995:5.
  • 8Hennekens CH. Clinical Trials in Cardiovascular Disease. W.B.Saunders Company 1999:24-30.
  • 9Hill AB. Principles of Medical Statistics, seventh edition 1961:258.
  • 10Lecoutre B, Mahika B, Derzko G. Assessment and monitoring in clinical trials when survival curves have distinct shapes: a Bayesian approach with Weibull modeling. Star Med 2002;21:663.

共引文献74

同被引文献461

引证文献36

二级引证文献339

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部