期刊文献+

后人类主义视野中的实验室研究 被引量:3

Laboratory Study in the view of Posthumanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪80年代末期,通过对实验室的微观考察,哈金、古仃、谢廷娜、皮克林等提出了一套新的实验室理论:实验室是包含许多实验要素的系统,这些要素之间的相互作用促使了实验室科学的稳定。通过对实验室要素的分析,他们认为科学是物质力量和人类力量相互冲撞的实践过程,他们还重申了科学稳定性存在的必要性和可能性。 In the late 1980s,through their microcosmic exploration into the laboratory,Hacking,Gooding,Cetina,Pickering etc put forward a set of laboratory theory: laboratory is a stable system with many unstable ingredients,and their interplaying each other enables laboratory scientific stability.Through their analysis of laboratory ingredients,they think science practice is a process in which material agency and human agency interplay each other,they reaffirmed the necessary and possibility of science stability.
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期42-44,67,共4页 Science Technology and Dialectics
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1布鲁诺·拉图尔,史蒂夫·伍尔加.实验室生活[M].张伯霖,刁小英译.北京:东方出版社,2004.4、17.
  • 2Andrew Picketing. From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice [ C ]. Andrew Piekering (ed.). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago University, 1992.2.
  • 3安德鲁·皮克林.实践的冲撞[M].邢冬梅译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004,23、7.
  • 4赵万里.科学的社会建构[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2002..
  • 5David Gooding. Putting Agency Back into Experiment [ C]. Andrew Pickering (ed.). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago University, 1992.75.
  • 6Karin Knorr Cetina. The Couch, the Cathedral, and Laboratory: On the Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory in Science[C]. Andrew Picketing ( ed. ). Scienceas Practice and Culture. Chicago University, 1992. 114,121.
  • 7Ian Hacking. The Self - vindication of the Laboratory Sciences[C]. Andrew Picketing (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago University, 1992.30,39,41.
  • 8Joan H Fujimura. Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and "Translation" [C]. Andrew Pickering (ed.). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago University, 1992. 169.

共引文献59

同被引文献12

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部