期刊文献+

明末清初公理化方法未能在我国广泛传播的原因 被引量:3

The Reason that the Influence of Axiomatic Method not Great in the Late of Ming Dynast and in the Early of Qing Dynast
下载PDF
导出
摘要 明末清初随着《几何原本》等西方文献的汉译,在西方社会盛行了近两千年的公理化方法来到了中国。这种方法中国古代没有,且和近代科学的关系密切,本应受到国人的欢迎,并能尽快在科学研究中应用和传播。但事实却相反,公理化方法传入后一直被国人冷落,直到晚清。从当时的实际出发,我们认为这主要有三个原因:1、《几何原本》生涩难读;2、“西学中源”说轻视西方科学;3、公理化方法传来的时候本身不完整。正是这三个原因造成了当时公理化方法传播的停滞。 In the late of Ming dynast and in the early of Qing dynast,much western scientific knowledge was introduced into China by missionaries,so the axiomatic method came to our country together.The axiomatic method was really useful to the development of modern science and technology,but then Chinese did not attach the importance on it.According the fact of then,we think there were three chief reasons.The first one is that the Chinese edition of Elements was very difficult to read,and the second one is the idea that all western knowledge originated from China belittle the axiomatic method,the third one is that no logic knowledge came with it then.These three reasons let the spread of axiomatic method stagnate for a long time.
作者 杨泽忠
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期84-87,共4页 Science Technology and Dialectics
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1沈定平.瞿太素的家世、信仰及其在中西文化交流中的作用[J].中国史研究,1997(1):135-146. 被引量:4
  • 2利玛窦.利玛窦中国札记[M].北京:中华书局,1983..
  • 3Peter M. Engelfriet. Euclid in China [M]. Boston: Leiden Brill, 1998, 132 - 133.
  • 4H. Bernard, S. J. Matteo Ricci's Scientific Contribution to China[M]. Peiping: Henri Vetch, 1935.52.
  • 5C. Clavius. Astrolabium [ M ], Romae: Ex Typogrphia Gabiana, 1593.
  • 6利玛窦.天主实义[M].天学初函[Z].台湾:台湾学生书局,1965.
  • 7徐光启.徐光启集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.76—78.
  • 8梁启超.中国近三百年学术史[M].台湾:中华书局,1958..
  • 9吴文俊.中国数学家大系(第七卷)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000.249.
  • 10江晓原.试论清代“西学中源”说[J].自然科学史研究,1988,7(2):101-108. 被引量:40

共引文献163

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部