论程端学驳前儒以“日月时例”解经

On Cheng Duan-xue's Denounce Refute of the Former Scholars Using Ri Yue Shi Li to Explain Spring and Autumn Annals

程端学是元代一位著名的《春秋》学者,其《春秋》学著作有《春秋本义》、《程氏春秋或问》和《春秋三传辨疑》三部。在这三部著作中,程端学循着朱熹的思路,从《春秋》之作和《春秋》之义的体现这两个角度对前儒以日月时例解经进行了激烈的攻驳,同时指出了以日月时例解经穿凿附会、破碎经旨、变乱是非等弊病,使《春秋》不以日月时为例的立论更具说服力。

Cheng duan - xue was a famous scholar on the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in Yuan Dynasty. His bookmakings about Spring and Autumn Annals named Chun Qiu Ben Yi , Cheng Shi Chun Qiu Huo Wen and Chun Qiu San Zhuan Bian Yi. In these three bookmakings ,Cheng duan - xue refuted former scholars using Ri Yue Shi li to explain Spring and Autumn Annals. In this point ,he followed Zhuxi＇s thought. He refuted former scholars from the making of Spring and Autumn Annals and the embodiment of Spring and Autumn Annals＇s meaning these two angles. At the same time,he pointed out former scholars using Ri Yue Shi Li＇s disadvantages,such as giving strained interpretation and draw farfetched analogies, crashing Spring and Autumn Annals＇s aim ,tuimoiling fight and wrong. So Cheng Duan - xue made the point that Spring and Autumn Annals hasn＇s Ri Yue Shi Li had more persuasion.