期刊文献+

认同建构中的时间取向 被引量:7

Construction of National Identity and Its Time Direction
原文传递
导出
摘要 民族认同的建构与“时间性”密切相关。通过分析中国现代民族认同的两大建构路径,即“现在—未来”导向路径和“现在—过去”导向路径,可以看出,在时间性的三个层面里,“现在”扮演了极重要的角色。“现在—未来”导向的路径从未来寻求合法性,主张现代与传统的断裂,民族认同的建构所依据的是精英知识分子所设定的民族国家的规划。而“现在—过去”导向路径则是从过去寻找合法性,以回归传统、挖掘新的传统或是重构传统的方式,通过与“过去”建立起联系,使自身权威化。无论是哪一种路径,民族认同建构都是以“现在”为核心的。因此,在民族认同建构的“时间性”问题中,“现在”之重要不仅仅在于“民族认同”是现代现象,它更是重组过去和未来关系的关键。相对于“真实的过去”的不可改变,“未来”的不确定,“现在”却为建构者的主体经验参与到认同建构中提供了机遇。在重组过程中,建构者得以充分调用“过去”和“未来”的资源,使民族认同获得它所需要的多元的合法性。 The construction of national identity is closely related with time. When analyzing approaches to the reconstruction of Chinese modern national identity, we can see that the present time plays the most important role of three phases of time. The present-to-future approach seeks its legitimacy from the future time, insisting a rupture between the present and the past. The construction of national identity takes as its premise what the elite intellectuals propose as a blueprint of nation- state. The present-to-past approach finds its legitimacy in the opposite direction, and takes it for granted that connecting the construction of national identity with the past by returning to the tradition, finding out new tradition, or reconstructing tradition is a necessary route to gain its authority. Nevertheless, the present is central in either approach. The national identity is not only a modern phenomenon, but a linchpin to relate the past with the future. While the past is established as truth, the future is uncertain, and the present is indeed an opportunity for the subjective experience to be involved in the reconstruction of identity, during which, the national identity will obtain its multi-legitimacy from the past and the future.
作者 殷曼楟
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期108-115,共8页 Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 国家"985工程""汉语言文学与民族认同"哲学社会科学创新基地成果
关键词 民族认同 认同建构 建构路径 时间取向 national identity construction of national identity approach time direction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1盖尔纳.民族与民族主义.北京:中央编译出版社,2002:5.
  • 2Eric Hobsbawm. Language, Culture, and National Identity. Social Research, 1996 ( winter).
  • 3钱玄同.汉字改革与国语运动//钱玄同文集:第三卷.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999:62.
  • 4安德森.想象的共同体.上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
  • 5伯格,卢克曼.社会实体的建构.台北:巨流图书公司,1991:169.
  • 6巴赫金.弗朗索瓦.拉伯雷的创作与中世纪和文艺复兴时代的民间文化导言//巴赫金文论选.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996:102.
  • 7杜赞奇 王宪明译.从民族国家拯救历史:民族主义话语与中国现代史研究[M].北京:社科文献出版社,2003..
  • 8Anthony D. Smith. Theories of Nationalism Alternative Models of Nation Formation// Michael Leifer. Asian Nationalism. London : Routledge, 2000.

共引文献6

同被引文献48

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部