期刊文献+

论经济法诉讼的实体法支持 被引量:1

On the Sustainment of Substantive Law in Economic Law Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经济法实体法不仅是经济法诉讼的裁判依据,而且应当为经济法诉讼的启动和推行提供支持,这是经济法可诉性得以实现的重要前提。经济法实体法对经济法诉讼的支持主要通过惩罚性赔偿责任制度、作为司法制裁依据的经济法责任制度和赋予公益诉讼原告实体请求权来实现。惩罚性赔偿激励私人诉讼,通过私人诉讼维护公共利益,受害人获取的惩罚性赔偿金可以理解为其维护公共利益的收益,这也是惩罚性赔偿制度存在的合理依据;司法制裁为司法机关查处经济违法行为提供了法律手段,使通过司法途径制裁经济违法行为成为可能;赋予公益诉讼原告实体请求权是公益诉讼制度得以推行的实体法保证。 It is the significant precondition of achieving the litigable possibility of Economic Law that substantive economic law is not only the judicial criterion in economic law litigation, but also supposed to provide the sustainment to the launching and advancing that litigation. This sustainment may be acquired mainly through the regime of liabilities for punitive damages, the system of responsibility in economic law as the criterion of judicial sanction, and the substantive right of claim conferred on plaintiff in public interest action. Private action, by which public interests can be safeguarded, may be encouraged by punitive damages, the rationality of which is that punitive damages for person aggrieved can be regarded as the benefit from his or her protection of public interests. Judicial sanction can offer judicial body the legal method to investigate into unlawful practice and deal with it accordingly, and make it possible to punish the economic unlawful practice through judicial settlement. And the implementation of commonweal lawsuit can get the guarantee of substantive law from conferring the substantive right of claim on plaintiff in public interest action.
作者 王新红
出处 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期63-67,72,共6页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 湖南省软科学课题"经济法纠纷司法解决机制研究"(05ZK3007)
关键词 经济法诉讼 惩罚性赔偿 经济法责任 实体请求权 Economic Law Litigation, Punitive Damages, Responsibility in Economic Law, Substantive Right of Claim
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1漆多俊,王新红.接近司法—经济法的诉讼问题.经济法论丛(第7卷),北京:中国方正出版社,2003.
  • 2《经济法纠纷司法解决机制研究》.中国法制出版社,2006年版,第198—200页.
  • 3王新红.论经济法诉讼支持系统[A].经济法论从(第11卷)[C].北京:中国方正出版社,2005:465.
  • 4Ernet C. Stiefel. U. S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany [J]. The American Journal of Comparative Law,1991 : 784.
  • 5John F. Vargo. The American Rule on Attorney Fee Allocation. The Injure Person's Access to Justice [J]. Am.U. L. Rev., 1993, 1567: 1575-1578.
  • 6EEOC v. Harbert- Yeargin, Inc., 266 F. 3d 498, 515 (6th Cir. 2001).
  • 7王利明.惩罚性赔偿研究[J].中国社会科学,2000(4):112-122. 被引量:840
  • 8杨立新.“王海现象”的民法思考──论消费者权益保护中的惩罚性赔偿金[J].河北法学,1997,15(5):1-9. 被引量:68
  • 9David C. Searle. Keeping the " Civil" in Civil Litigation. the need for a Punitive Damage Actual Damage Link in Title Ⅶ Cases [J]. Duke Law Journal, 2002, 51: 1683-1701.
  • 10[美]史蒂文·苏本,玛格瑞特·伍.美国民事诉讼真谛[M].蔡彦敏,徐卉译.北京:法律出版社,2002:226.

二级参考文献47

  • 1[1]Hand. The deficiencies of trials to reach the heart of the matter [R]. 3 Assn Bar City of N.Y. Lectures on Legal Topics 87,1926.
  • 2[2]Alexis DeTocqueville, Democracyin America[M]. New York:DouhledayAnchor ,1966.
  • 3[3]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.当事人基本程序保障权与未来的民事诉讼[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
  • 4[7]让·文森,塞尔日·金沙尔.法国民事诉讼法要义[Z].北京:中国法制出版社.2001.
  • 5[8]韩志红.中国经济法实施机制的完善与创新[R].厦门:第9届全国经济法理论研讨会,2001.
  • 6[10]史蒂文·苏本,玛格瑞特·伍.美国民事诉讼真谛[M].北京:法律出版社,2002.
  • 7[14]漆多俊,王新红."经济法纠纷"应由司法解决[N].检察日报,2003-01-01(3).
  • 8Note, "Exemplary Damages in the Law of Torts", 70 Harv. L. Rev. 517, 517 (1957), and Huckle v.Money, 95 Eng. Rep. 768 (K. B. 1763).
  • 9Malzof V. United Statea, I 12 S. Ct. 711, 715 (1992).
  • 10Ernet C. Stiefel: "U. S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany" , 39 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1991, p. 784.

共引文献1158

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部