期刊文献+

超声速大迎角分离流中三种湍流模型的比较研究 被引量:7

Comparison of three turbulence models in supersonic high-attack-angle separated flows
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对雷诺平均N-S方程的数值求解,模拟了细长旋成体在超声速大迎角下的流场,比较了S-A,SST和EASM三种湍流模型。不同轴向位置的物面周向压力分布和实验结果的对比结果表明:湍流模型对物面压力分布影响较大。横截面流态分析表明,空间主体涡结构受湍流模型影响不大,靠近壁面的二次分离涡的模拟精度和湍流模型密切相关。弹体积分气动力受湍流模型影响不大,和实验结果相当吻合。 Three popular turbulence models are compared by simulating the complex supersonic flows around long ogive-cylinder missile. A newly developed flux splitting scheme-AUSM^+ -up, is adopted to obtain high resolution and robustness. The numerical results show the capability of individual turbulence model in dealing with cross separation and vortices. S-A model under-predict the cross separation and can not capture the subtle secondary vortices correctly. SST model is compared to EASM model in capturing cross separation, however not as clearly as EASM in simulating the secondary vortices. But the integrated aerodynamic forces are similar for three models, and are within + 3 % agreement with experimental data. Higher Mach number can lead to earlier boundary-layer separation along axial location, and larger vortices developing in space.
出处 《空气动力学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期371-374,379,共5页 Acta Aerodynamica Sinica
关键词 SST EASM AUSM^+-up 湍流模型 细长体 SST EASM AUSM 6+ -up turbulence models long ogive-cylider
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1ESWAR JOSYULA.Computational study of high-attack-angle missile flows using two-equations turbulence models[R].AIAA97-0525,1997.
  • 2WALTER B STUREK.The application of CFD to the prediction of missile body vortices[R].AIAA 97-0637,1997.
  • 3LIOU Meng-Sing.A further development of the AUSM +scheme towards robust and accurate solutions for all speeds[R].AIAA 2003-4116,2003.
  • 4SPALART P R,ALLMARAS S R.A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[R].AIAA 92-0439,1992.
  • 5FLORIAN R MENTER.Zonal two qquation turbulence models for aerodynamic flows[R].AIAA 93-2906,1993.
  • 6RUMSEY C L,MORRISON J H.Turbulence model predictions of extra-strain rate effects in strongly-curved flows[R].ALAA 99-0157,1999.

同被引文献30

  • 1黄玉娟,李晓东,陈江.湍流模型对涡轮数值模拟结果的影响[J].工程热物理学报,2007,28(z1):97-100. 被引量:18
  • 2张辉,马宏伟,蒋浩康.压气机转子三维流场计算中叶尖间隙网格的影响[J].航空动力学报,2006,21(1):137-143. 被引量:4
  • 3邓小刚,宗文刚,张来平,高树椿,李超.计算流体力学中的验证与确认[J].力学进展,2007,37(2):279-288. 被引量:67
  • 4ESWAR J. Computational simulation improvements of supersonic high-attack-angle missile flows[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1999, 36(1):59-66.
  • 5ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43(2): 357-372.
  • 6ZHA Gecheng, HU Zongjuru Calculation of transonic internal flows using an efficient high resolution upwind scheme, AIAA 2004-1097 [R]. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2004.
  • 7ZHA Gecheng, SHEN Yiqing, WANG Baoyuan. Calculation of transonic flows using WENO method with a low diffusion E-CUSP upwind scheme, AIAA 2008-0745 [R]. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2008.
  • 8SPALART P R, ALLMARAS S R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, AIAA Paper 92-0439 [R]. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 1992.
  • 9VAN LEER B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme: V A second-order sequel to Godunov's method [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1979, 32(1): 101-136.
  • 10WALTER B S, TREVOR B, MARC L, et al. The application of CFD to the prediction of missile body vertices, AIAA Paper 97-0637 [R]. Reston, VA, USA:AIAA, 1997.

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部