期刊文献+

一种基于不同语言标度的语言信息评价方法 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对不同标度的语言评价信息,避免信息的丢失,采用三角模糊数对其进行转换。利用Topsis方法的思想,结合HA算子对数据进行处理。提出了一种基于不同语言标度的语言信息集结方法。并给出了实例,说明本文的方法合理、有效。
作者 高阳 周向红
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第18期60-61,共2页 Statistics & Decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Zadeh L A.A Computational Approach to Fuzzy Quantifiers in Natural Languages[J].Comput.Math.App 1,1983,9.
  • 2Herrera F,Verdegay J L.Linguistic Assessments in Group Decision[A].Proc 1st European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies[C].Aachen,1993.
  • 3Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E,Chiclana F.Multiperson Decisionmaking Based on Multiplicative Preference Relations[J].European Journal of Operational Reasearch.2001,129(2).
  • 4尤天慧,樊治平.区间数多指标决策的一种TOPSIS方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2002,23(9):840-843. 被引量:107
  • 5徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:65

二级参考文献14

  • 1Tong M, Bonissone P P. A linguistic approach to decision making with fuzzy sets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1980, 10: 716-723.
  • 2Zadeh L A. A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 1983, 9: 149-184.
  • 3Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. On aggregation operations of linguistic labels[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1993, 8: 351-370.
  • 4Yager R R. Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making[J]. Group Decision Negotiation, 1993, 2: 81-93.
  • 5Torra V. Negation functions based semantics for ordered linguistic labels[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1996, 11: 975-988.
  • 6Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 78: 73-87.
  • 7Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A linguistic modelling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-part A, 1997, 27: 126-132.
  • 8Godo L, Torra V. On aggregation operators for ordinal qualitative information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8: 143-154.
  • 9Herrera F, Martínez L. A fusion method for managing multi-granularity linguistic terms sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114: 43-58.
  • 10Herrera F, Martínez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranualr hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-part B, 2001, 31: 227-233.

共引文献169

同被引文献34

  • 1徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:65
  • 2陈振举,李文丽,张华宇,何兴元,陈玮,张春涛.逼近理想解排序方法与园林规划树种选择[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2006,25(B06):283-286. 被引量:3
  • 3Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 115(1):67-82.
  • 4Chen S J ,Hwang C L. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications[M].Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
  • 5Hwang C L ,Yoon k. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey[M].New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  • 6Liu C 1LFrazier P, Kumar L,等.Catchment-wide wetland assessment and prioritization using the multi-criteria decision-making method TOPSIS[J]. Environmental Management, 2006, 38(2):316-326.
  • 7王雄,吴庆田.基于模糊语言的科研基金项目立项评估研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(9):61-63. 被引量:11
  • 8许洁虹,李纾.汉语文字概率表达之数值转换的探索性研究[J].人类工效学,2007,13(4):15-18. 被引量:6
  • 9Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory : An analysis of decision under Risk [ J ]. Econometrica, 1979, 47 (2) : 263 - 292.
  • 10Coelho L A G, Pires C M P. The impact of CAP policy in farmer's behavior - A modeling approach using the Cumulative Prospect Theory [J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2012, 34(1 ): 81 -98.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部