期刊文献+

体育仲裁的目标价值取向探析——对我国体育仲裁立法的原则指引 被引量:2

A Research on the Value Goals of Sports Arbitration——A Direction for the Principles of Legislation of Sports Arbitration in ChinaLIU Su
下载PDF
导出
摘要 秩序、效率、公正是体育仲裁的三大价值目标。本文试图通过对这三大价值目标概念的阐释,每个价值目标与体育仲裁法律关系的考量,三大价值目标位阶性的辩证分析,透视出三大目标价值在我国体育仲裁立法中的核心位置。从而启示我国在体育仲裁立法时应依三大价值目标为根本取向和基本准则,在此导向下,对我国的仲裁立法提出原则和制度上的建构。 Order, Efficiency and fairness are the three value goals of sports arbitration. The author of this article attempts to get a clear picture of the core position of the three value goals in the legislation of sports arbitration in China through an explanation of the notion of the three value goals,a measurement of the legal relationship between each value goal and sports arbitration and a dialectical analysis of the three value goals by periodic scales. It is suggested that China should regard the three value goals as its fundamental and essential principles in its sports arbitration legislation, propose the principles of legislation and construct the system under the guidance of the abovementioned principles.
作者 刘苏
出处 《首都体育学院学报》 2006年第5期13-16,共4页 Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports
关键词 秩序 效率 公正 价值取向 Order Efficiency Fairness Value orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[美]E·博登海默,邓正来译.法理学、法哲学及其方法[M].华夏出版社,1987.207.
  • 2[美]彼得·斯坦约翰·香德.西方社会的法的价值[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1989.38.
  • 3孙同鹏.经济立法问题研究—制度变迁与公共视角的选择[M].中国政法大学出版社,2004.252.
  • 4庞德.通过法律的社会控制—法律的任务[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984..
  • 5张立伟 谢晖 陈金钊.乡村社会的秩序与纠纷处理[A].谢晖,陈金钊.民间法[C].山东:山东人民出版社,2002.151.
  • 6Stephen Weartherill,Do sporting associations make "law"or are they merely subject to it? European Business Law Review,July/August [J]. 1998:218.
  • 7[美]凯斯 费尔 郭建青 译.经济学原理(上)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1994..
  • 8[美]马丁.P.戈尔丁著 齐海滨译.法律哲学[M].三联书店,1987.232.
  • 9格尔哈德·帕普克,知识、自由与秩序[M].转引自高全喜.法律陕序与自由正义[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.81.
  • 10顾培东.社会冲突与诉讼机制[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1991.16-17.

二级参考文献49

  • 1FToschi.
  • 2John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971.
  • 3Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985.
  • 4David E Aptei.The Politics of Modernization,1985.
  • 5MKucharska et al.
  • 6Frank K.Upham.Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan,1987.
  • 7Joseph A Schumpeter.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy,1976.
  • 8Morton J Horwitz.The transformation of American law,1977.
  • 9Charles A Miller.The Forest of Due Process of Law:The American Constitution TraditionDue Process(NOMOS XVIII),1977.
  • 10Cover, R.M,&Fiss, O.M,&. Resnik,J.Procedure,1988.

共引文献775

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部