期刊文献+

兴奋剂处罚的“严格责任”原则 被引量:8

On the Meaning of Strict Liability in the Discipline for Doping
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过案例分析,对兴奋剂处罚中的“严格责任”原则进行分析,指出严格责任原则存在的争议和矛盾,即为了体育的健康发展,应该适应严格责任原则,但是“严格责任”存在着对无辜运动员进行处罚的风险;在兴奋剂处罚中存在着公众利益和个体利益的冲突,出于对不同利益的考虑,可能会产生不同的结果;在利益的冲突中,体育的健康发展被认为是首要的;为了保护运动员的权益,在实践中,一些体育组织认为“严格责任”过于严厉,采取弱化“严格责任”的做法,给予运动员辩解的机会,在处罚中考虑其是否有过错,我国兴奋剂处罚也采取了这一做法。 hrough case studies,the author of this paper has analyzed the meaning of "strict liability" in the discipline for doping,pointed out current disputes and conflicts when applying the principle of strict liability and argued that the principle should be abided for the sake of the healthy development of sports. However, there are risks of punishing innocent athletes with the principle of strict liability because there exist conflicts of public interest and individual interest in discipline for doping and there may be different results out of consideration of different interests. Among conflict of interest, the healthy development of sports is normally considered to be the first priority. In reality, Some sports organizations believe the principle of strict liability is too harsh and tend to weaken strict liability and carefully check whether there are faults in doping discipline by giving athletes the opportunity to explain in order to protect their interests. Currently, sports organizations in China have also adopted these measures in sports discipline.
作者 韩勇
机构地区 首都体育学院
出处 《首都体育学院学报》 2006年第5期17-21,共5页 Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports
关键词 体育纪律处罚 兴奋剂 严格责任 Sports discipline Doping Strict liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1张振玟.反兴奋剂斗争面临种种问题[J].国外体育动态,1996,(6).
  • 2Queen's Bench Division, unreported ,June 15,1988.
  • 3The Times, April 8,1996 (CA, March 26,1996).
  • 4McCutcheon,P.,Sports discipline, natural justice and strict liability. Anglo American law review, 1999.28(1) :p. 37-72.
  • 5Get IAAF to pay Krabbe Compensation,BBC Sport,June 27, 2001, at http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/sport/hi/english/athletics/newsid-1410000/1410443.stm (last visited Feb. 22,2002.
  • 6McCutcheon, P., Sports discipline, natural justice and strict liability. Anglo-American law review, 1999.28(1) :p. 37-72.
  • 7李秋高,汪习根.论体育立法的价值取向冲突及其整合[A].邹立刚,戴仲川,编.华侨大学法学论丛(第1卷)[C].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2005.27—35.
  • 8罗小霜.浅析反兴奋剂处罚的归责原则——以国际体育仲裁实践为视角[J].浙江体育科学,2005,27(6):18-21. 被引量:4
  • 9McCutcheon, P. ,Sports discipline, natural justice and strict liability. Anglo-American law review, 1999.28(1) :p. 37-72.
  • 10郭树理.奥林匹克体育仲裁制度研究[C].民商法论丛(第29卷),转引自http://article.chinalawinfo.com/article/user/article-display.asp?ArticleID=31326.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Tarasti, Strict Liability in Doping Case in the Light of Decisions Mede by the Arbitration Panal of the IAAF(Conference Paper 1997).
  • 2Re Capobianco,Arbitration Award of 17 March 1997 , I-AAF Arbitration Panel.
  • 3USA shooting and Quigley v. Union Internationale de Tir, CAS94/129.
  • 4Decision of Legal Committee (Rechtsausschuss) of DLV,March 26, 1993 (RA 10/92 ), published in SpuRt,March - April, 1996, pp. 66~69.
  • 5Changnaud v. FINA ,CAS 95/41.
  • 6Andreea Raducan v International Olympic Commtittee(IOC) ,CAS OG 00/01.
  • 7杨要武.对兴奋剂程序中举证合法性的探讨[EB/OL].http:∥www.sportinfo.net.cn/MENU2/sport-development/gwtydt/2000/0306-4.htm,.

共引文献3

同被引文献222

引证文献8

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部