期刊文献+

岩溶地区地下水防污性能评价——PI方法 被引量:12

ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY IN KARST AREAS USING PI METHOD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地下水防污性能评价是保护地下水资源的有效工具.国内外专家进行了许多研究,提出了多种地下水防污性能评价模型,最常用的是DRASTIC模型.但这些模型主要适用于孔隙水地区,对岩溶地区的适应性差.为了研究岩溶地区地下水防污性能,欧洲专家提出了欧洲方法(Europeanapproach).在欧洲方法这个概念模型的基础上,学者提出了多种岩溶地区地下水防污性能评价方法,如PI方法、VULK方法、LEA方法、COP方法和Time-Input方法.本文主要对PI方法进行了较详细的介绍,并指出应用该方法时应注意的问题. Groundwater vulnerability assessment is a useful tool for groundwater resource protection. Many studies have been done and several vulnerability assessment models have been carried out for assessing groundwater vulnerability worldwide, such as the widely used DRASTIC model. These assessment models are the same with the loose Quaternary deposits but are not the same with karst area. In order to assessing groundwater vulnerability of karst area, European approach have been brought forward. It is an conceptual model of "origin-pathway-target". Several vulnerability assessments for karst area have been carried out basing on the conceptual model. Such as PI Method, VULK Method, LEA Method, COP Method 和 Time-Input Method.In this paper, PI Method has been detalledly introduced and point out some attentive problem.
出处 《新疆地质》 CAS CSCD 2006年第3期318-321,共4页 Xinjiang Geology
关键词 防污性能 欧洲方法 资源保护 水源保护 渗透条件 vulnerability European approach resource protection source protection,Infiltration condition
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1吴长文,王礼先.林地坡面的水动力学特性及其阻延地表径流的研究[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(2):32-38. 被引量:50
  • 2Yang Qing,Progress Report 1998 National Laboratory of Civil Engineering Lisbon Portugal,1998年
  • 3贾亚男 袁道先 何多兴.浅议岩溶地下水水质变化与土地利用的关系—以桂林东区为例[A].中国地质调查局.中国岩溶地下水与石漠化研究[c].南宁:广西科学技术出版社,2003.12:218-225.
  • 4SCHIK)SSER S A, McCRAY J E, HYLE E M. A subregional-scale method to assess aquifer vulnerability to pesticides[J]. Ground Water, 2002, 40(4):361-367.
  • 5ALLEIR L, BENNETT T, LEHR J H, et al. DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater potential using hydrogeological settings[A]. ROBERT S K. US EPA Report[R]. Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada Oklahorrm,1985.
  • 6IBE K M, COLLIN M L, MELLOULA J. Assessment of ground water vulnerability and its application to the development of protection strategy for the water supply aquifer in Owerri southern Nigeria[J]. EnvironmentalMonitoring and Assessment, 2001, 67:323-360.
  • 7KIM Y J, HAMM S Y. Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique in Cheogju area, South Korea[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 1999, 7:227-235.
  • 8SECUNDA S, COlA.IN M L, MEI.LOUI. A J. Ground water vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel's Saron region[J]. J Environ Management, 1998, 54:39-57.
  • 9VIERHUFF H. Classification of groundwater resources for regional planning with regard to their vulnerability to pollution[A], van DUIJVENBOODEN W, GLASBERGEN P,van LEYVELD H. Studies in Environmental Science EC].1981,17:1101-1104.
  • 10GOGU R C, DASSARGUES A. Current trends and future challenges in ground water vulnerability assessment using overly and index methods[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000,39 (6):549-559.

共引文献241

同被引文献100

引证文献12

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部