期刊文献+

空军机务人员应对方式与心理健康关系的研究 被引量:4

Study on Psychological Health and Its Related Factors in Certain Air Force Airplane-service Men
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨机务人员的应对方式与心理健康之间的关系。方法整群抽样抽取机务人员216名,以不同中队为单位集中进行应对方式量表、症状自评量表测试。结果(1)SCL-90各因子与应对方式各因子显著相关(P<0.01),且与解决问题、求助因子应对方式呈显著负相关(P<0.01),与其余4个因子呈显著正相关(P<0.01)。(2)心理异常者除解决问题与求助因子外,应对方式的其余4个因子均高于心理健康者。(3)军龄较长,级别较高,文化程度在大专以上的机务人员主要采用解决问题应对方式,而较少采用不成熟型应对方式。结论心理健康水平影响机务人员应对方式的选择,且不同军龄、不同级别以及不同文化程度机务人员应对方式存在差异。 Objective To investigate the status of psychological health and its related factors in air force airplane - service men so as to provide scientific basis for psychological consult and therapy. Methods SCL-90 was used to evaluate :216 air force airplaneservice men. Results ( 1 ) The score of interpersonal sensitivity was lower in air force airplane-service men than in national normal models ( P 〈 0.05 ) , and the score of psychoticism was higher than that of national norm ( P 〈 0.05 ). The total mean score and all factorial score in air force airplane-service men were significantly lower than those in military norm ( P 〈 0.01 ). (2) There were statistical differences in psychological health level related to age, educational level, and only-child or non-only-child. The factorial scorcs had no statistical difference ( P 〉 0.05), except that those of somatization, depression, anxiety and hostility factor were lower in over 30 years group than in under 29 years group. No difference in the scores of psychological health related to educational background was found ( P 〉 0.05 ) , except that those of hostility and paranoid ideation factor was significantly higher in low diploma possessors than in high diploma possessors ( P 〈 0.05 ). The total mean scores and all factorial in the only-child group were significandy higher than those in non-only-child group (P 〈 0.01 ) , except the score of hostility factor. Conclusion The psychological health of air force airplane-service men is well in general, and the main causes of the psychological problem may be severe work stress, intense competition and heavy family responsibility, etc.
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2006年第5期600-602,共3页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词 应对方式 心理健康 机务人员 psychological health airplane-service man SCL - 90
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献18

  • 1肖计划,许秀峰.“应付方式问卷”效度与信度研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):164-168. 被引量:781
  • 2汪向东 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12..
  • 3龚耀先修订.艾森克个性问卷手册[M].长沙:湖南医科大学,1986..
  • 4王向东主编.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1993.36-40.
  • 5.GJB2125-94.部队健康评价[S].中国人民解放军总后勤部,1994..
  • 6李权超主编.军事应激心理学[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2002.280.
  • 7廖晓平,解亚宁,朱秀清,黄义春,张勇.社会支持和应付方式与装甲车辆乘员患神经衰弱的相关性研究[J].解放军预防医学杂志,1997,15(2):117-119. 被引量:16
  • 8Lazarus RS,Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping.NewYork:springer.1984
  • 9Ruffin CL.Stress and health:little hassles vs major life events.Australian Psychologist,1993,28(3): 201-208
  • 10汪向东主编.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志出版社,1999.31-35.

共引文献161

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部