期刊文献+

重新犯罪风险评估的理论与方法 被引量:6

Appraisal Theory and Methods on Re-crime Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 重新犯罪风险评估是罪犯出监前和社区矫正前的重要环节。重新犯罪风险评估中的难题是如何选取预测效度高的指标。提出重新犯罪风险评估模型,引入内隐联想测验方法,并指出犯罪人刑满释放前的敌意态度、特定的人格特征、犯罪风险知觉、社会适应性,可能是预测重新犯罪风险的良好指标。 Assessment on the offenders'crime risk in the future is an important step for prison and community. One of the most difficult is to select valid indexes for effective prediction. In this study, based on reviewing literature, an assessment model on re - crime risk was proposed. Contrast with those classic assessment theories on re - crime, a new method was used in the model: Implicit association test for hostility and antisocial attitude; three indexes assessment on that hostility attitude through IAT before released and criminal risk perception and social cognitive skills for adapting social life after released was emphasized.
出处 《河南司法警官职业学院学报》 2006年第3期26-30,共5页 Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词 内隐联想测验 敌意态度 犯罪风险知觉 社会认知技能 implicit association test (IAT) hostility criminal risk perception social cognitive skills
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献82

  • 1蔡华俭,杨治良.大学生性别自我概念的结构[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):168-174. 被引量:56
  • 2蔡华俭,周颖,史青海.内隐联想测验(IAT)及其在性别刻板印象研究中的应用[J].社会心理研究,2001(4):6-11. 被引量:36
  • 3周路.重视对当代犯罪中观、微观规律的实证研究[J].贵州省政法管理干部学院学报,2002,14(6):49-54. 被引量:1
  • 4[1]Greenwald A G, McGhee E, Schwartz J L K. Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(5): 181~198
  • 5[2]Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit Social Cognition. Attitudes, Self-Esteem and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(1): 4~27
  • 6[3]Farnham S D, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit self-esteem. In: Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A ed. Social Identity and Social Cognition. Blackwell Publishers Inc, 1999. 230~248
  • 7[4]Greenwald A G, Klinger M R, Liu T J. Unoconcious processing of dichoptically masked words. Memory and cognition, 1989,17: 35~47
  • 8[5]Murphy S T, Zajoc R B. Affect ,cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 64: 723~739
  • 9[6]Dasgupta N, McGhee D E, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000, 36: 316~328
  • 10[7]McConnell A R, Leibold J M. Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001, 37: 435~442

共引文献319

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部