摘要
自由刑和财产刑虽然都是被告人实现刑事责任的方式,但是二者有着不同的功效、目的和作用,两者不是简单的加减关系,也不是此消彼长的关系,因此二者之间不能易科;为弥补行政“追缴”、“没收”而适用财产刑的做法,无论是在实体上还是程序上都违背了法治原则;在司法实践中我们不应排斥对未成年被告人适用财产刑,应该具体情况具体分析。
Although punishment against liberty and property - oriented penalties are both accused of criminal responsibility, but they have different efficacy, purpose and role ,they are not a simple individual, or growing relationship ,so they can not be transacted; to compensate for administrative " recover ", "confiscation" and applicant the property - oriented penalties, it violates the principles of the rule of law, whether in the entity or procedurally; in judicial practice, we should not exclude the application of minors accused of criminal property, but analysis the specific case.
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2006年第3期38-40,共3页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词
财产刑
易科
追缴
没收
未成年人
property - oriented penalties
punishment transaction
recover
confiscation
the minors