期刊文献+

关于语法的哲学思考 被引量:1

A Philosophical Perspective of Grammar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语法其实并不具有独立的表意功能。因此,用语法来约束人们的语言表达方式并不具备坚实的语法哲学基础。群众语言的创造性天性,使得语言的形式化变得非常重要,这样才能使语言具有可演绎性。汉语由于可演绎性程度偏低,而导致了“脑筋急转弯”之类的语言恶作剧。语法的本质实际上就是语言习惯与语义逻辑之间的整合。语法应该建立在广泛的语言用法调查的基础上,这样才能避免语法规则脱离群众的“贵族化”倾向。 In fact grammar does not have independent expressive function. Therefore, the idea to restrain people' s way of expression through grammar in language does not hold solid philosophical foundation. The gift of creativeness for languages makes it important for the form of language, thus rendering languages deductive. Due to the relatively low deductiveness, there exist the tricks like "quick tunas of the brains" in the Chinese language. In essence grammar is the integration of language habits and the logic of semantics. Grammar must be built upon the investigation of the use of languages so as to avoid the tendencv of the linguistic rules above the practice of the broad masses.
作者 张功耀
机构地区 中南大学哲学系
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期25-29,共5页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 语法 语言 哲学 grammar philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[1]See Emilio Segrè's "From Falling Bodies To Radio Waves",W.H.Freeman And Company New York,1984,P55.
  • 2[4]Eric P.Hamp,Historical Sketch of English Language,In "The Randomhouse Dictionary Of The English Language",2nd edition,Unabridged,1983.
  • 3[5]Eric P.Hamp,Historical Sketch of English Language,in Stuart Berg Flexner (editor in chief),"The Random House Dictionary Of The English Language",2nd edition,Unabridged,1987.
  • 4[6]Randolph quirk,with the others,a comprehensive grammar of the English langusge,longman world publishing corp.,1985,vol.1.

同被引文献17

  • 1Berko- Gleason, J. 1982. Insights from child language acquisi- tion for second language [ A]. R. Lambert and B. Freed ( eds. ). The Loss of Language Skills [ C ]. Mass. : Newbury House, 13 - 23.
  • 2Berman,A. & E. Olshtain. 1983. Features of first language trans- fer in second language attrition I J]. Applied Linguistics (3) :222 -234.
  • 3Cohen, A. 1975. Forgetting a second language [J]. Language Learning( I ) : 127 - 138.
  • 4Freud, S. 1920. A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis [ M]. S. Hall. Tr. New York:Boni and Liveright.
  • 5Hansen, L. & Y. Chen. 2001. What counts in the acquisition and attrition of numeral classifiers? [J]. JALT Journal( 1 ) :90 - 110.
  • 6Hansen, L. 1999. Not a total loss :The attrition of Japanese nega- tion over three decades [ A]. In L Hansen ( eds. ) , Second Language Attrition in Japanese Contexts [ C]. Oxford:Ox- ford University Press, 142 - 153.
  • 7Hayashi, B. 1999. Testing the regression hypothesis : The remains of the Japanese negation system in Mieronesia [ A]. In L Hansen (ed.). Second Language Attrition in Japanese Context [ C ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 154 - 168.
  • 8Hedgcock, J. 1991. Foreign language retention and attrition: A study of regression models [ J]. Foreign Language Annals (1) :43 -55.
  • 9Jakobson, R. 1968. Kindersprache, Aphasie, und Allegemeine Lautgesetze( 1941 ) [M]. A. Keller as Child Language, A- phasia, and Phonological Universals ( translators ). Uppsala, The Hague : Mouton :46 - 64.
  • 10Jordens, P. , K. de Bot & H. Trapman. 1989. Linguistic aspects of regression in German case marking [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (2) : 179 - 204.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部