期刊文献+

腹膜透析置管术预防性抗生素用药的前瞻性随机对照临床研究 被引量:11

Prospective randomized controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis for newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheter to prevent postoperative peritonitis and wound infection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较新置腹膜透析管患者预防性抗生素用药的疗效,为国内腹膜透析置管术预防性使用抗生素的时机、途径和种类的共识提供依据。方法选择腹膜透析的患者78例,其中男性33例,女性45例,平均年龄(48.2±15.7)岁。进行为期1年的前瞻性随机对照临床研究。患者被随机分为两组,每组39例。A组:在腹膜透析置管术前30 min静脉注射头孢曲松1.0 g。B组:在术后3 d内使用0.25 g/L头孢唑啉的腹透液。术后每日检查患者伤口情况,记录体温,检查血白细胞计数和分类情况及透出液常规。结果两组患者在置管术后10 d内,都没有发生手术切口感染、隧道感染及腹膜炎。A组39例中有1例出现出口处感染,占2.5%;B组39例中有2例出现出口处感染,占5.1%,两组间差异无统计学意义。两组患者术后体温、血白WBC数及分类、透出液WBC胞计数均在正常范围,两组间差异没有统计学意义。结论在新置腹膜透析管患者伤口感染和腹膜炎的发生率方面,术前一次性给予抗生素的方式与传统的术后腹腔内给予抗生素方式差异无统计学意义,但前者在临床使用上更为简便。 Objective To assess the efficacy of two antibiotic prophylactic regimens in a prospective randomized trial in 1 year for patients undergoing insertion of catheters, and to provide the evidence for uniform consensus existing on the timing, route, and choice of antibiotic. Methods During a period of 12 months, 78 patients, who consecutively entered the peritoneal dialysis programme, [45 women and 33 men, mean age (48.2±15.7)years] were included. The prophylactic regimens were a single dose of ceftriaxone (1.0 g) given intravenously 30 minutes before surgery (Group A) and given cefazolin (0.25 g/L) i.p. in the each dialysis bag for 3 days postoperatively (Group B). All operations were performed in one room. The wound was observed every day, and body temperature, Count of white blood corpuscle and type, dialysate were examined every day. Results In Group A and B, none of the patients showed peritonitis or wound infection during the post-operative period (within 10 days). One of 39 patients(2.5%) in the group A, and 2 of 39 patients (5.1%) in the group B had exit site infection (P 〉 0.05). Conclusions There is no significant difference in the incidence of peritonitis and wound infection between two groups. Prophylactic preoperative single-dose antibiotics intravenously do as well as antibiotics given intraperitoneally for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion, but is much more convenient.
出处 《中华肾脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第10期601-604,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology
关键词 腹膜透析 头孢唑啉 抗生素预防 头孢曲松 伤口感染 Peritoneal dialysis Cefazolin Leftriaxone Antibiotic prophylaxis Wound
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Coles GA, Lewis SL, Williams JD. Host defense and effects of solutions on peritoneal cell. In:Gokal R, Nolph KD, eels. The Textbook of peritoneal dialysis. Netherland Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.503-528.
  • 2Johnston C. Diabetic skin and soft tissue infection. Curt Opin Infect Dis, 1994,7 : 214-218.
  • 3Lye WC, Lee E J, Tan C. Prophylactic antibiotics in the insertion of Tenckhoff catheters. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1992,26 : 177-180.
  • 4Wikdahl AM, Engman U, Stegmayr BG, et al. One-dose cefuroxime i.v. and i.p. reduces microbial growth in PD patients after catheter insertion. Nephrol Dial Transplant,1997, 12: 157-160.
  • 5Leaper DJ. Prophylactic and therapeutic role of antibiotics in wound care. Am J Surg, 1994, 167(1A) : 15S-19S.
  • 6Ludwig KA, Carlson MA, Condon RE. Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery. Annu Rev Med, 1993,44:385-393.
  • 7US Renal Data System. USRDS 1992 Annual Data Report.The National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Bethesda MD, 1992.37-44.
  • 8Golper TA, Brier ME, Bunke M, et al. Risk factors for peritonitis in long-term peritoneal dialysis: the Network 9 peritonitis and catheter survival studies. Academic Subcommittee of the Steering Committee of the Network 9Peritonitis and Catheter Survival Studies. Am J Kidney Dis,1996,28 : 428-436.
  • 9杨念生,钟琼,陈雄辉,汪涛,叶任高,余学清.持续性非卧床腹膜透析腹膜炎的致病菌及其耐药性[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2001,17(6):375-378. 被引量:21
  • 10Port FK, Held PJ, Nolph KD, et al. Risk of peritonitis and technique failure by CAPD connection technique: a national study. Kidney Int, 1992,42:967-974.

二级参考文献1

  • 1叶任高,肾脏病诊断与治疗学,1994年,586页

共引文献20

同被引文献66

引证文献11

二级引证文献188

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部